IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Alok Industries Limited - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 4680 of 2021
Decided On : 30-11-2021
Vacancy - Adjudicating Authority - The court issued directions to the government to fill vacancies at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA, emphasizing the need for efficient functioning and considering the shortage of staff members and vacancies at various levels.
Fact of the Case:
The court noticed a substantial quantum of work at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA and an acute shortage of staff members and vacancies at various levels.
Finding of the Court:
The court issued directions to the government to take steps for filling up the vacant positions within specified timeframes, and requested a status report to be filed within two months.
Issues: Vacancies at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA and the need for efficient functioning.
Ratio Decidendi: The government was directed to fill up the vacant positions within specified timeframes and consider increasing staff strength based on the quantum of cases before the Adjudicating Authority.
Final Decision: The matter was listed for reporting compliance, and the status of the appointments was to be placed on record by way of an affidavit with the latest updates.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.
2. Vide order dated 28th September 2021, this Court had noticed, from the affidavit filed by the Ministry of Finance, that the quantum of work at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA is substantial, however there is an acute shortage of staff members and there are vacancies at the level of the Chairperson, Member (Administration) and Member (Law). This Court had also noticed that the positions of the Administrative Officer, Registrar and the Court Master are all vacant as well. Accordingly, keeping in mind the need of the Adjudicating Authority to function in an efficient manner, the following directions were issued:
(i) Insofar as the Chairperson is concerned, it is submitted by Mr. Mahajan, Id. CGSC, under instructions from Mr. Pandey, that the selection for the Chairperson is underway and is likely to conclude shortly.
(ii) For the positions of Member (Administration) and Member (Law), the proposal for issuance of vacancy circulars is stated to be under consideration. Since these positions have been vacant for a considerable period of time, the Government is directed to take steps for filling up the said posts, within a period of three months.
(iii) Insofar as the Administrative Officer and Registrar are concerned, in view of the recommendations of the UPSC, as also the lack of a sufficient number of applicants, it appears that appointments have not taken place despite the vacancy circulars having been issued. Even in respect of Court Masters and other staff, such as working staff and peons etc., they have also been retained on a contractual basis. Stenographers and Court Masters would be absolutely essential in the efficient functioning of the Adjudicating Authority. The Id. CGSC Mr. Amit Mahajan along with Mr. Ritvik Pandey submits that it may be possible to explore posting of some officials from other departments to meet the exigency. Thus, if these vacancies cannot be filled up through fresh recruitment, the Ministry shall take steps to fill up all these vacancies through alternate means, within a period of one month from today.
(iv) The Government would also consider, keeping in mind the quantum of cases before the Adjudicating Authority, as to whether the staff strength needs to be increased, and if so the vacancy circulars, which are to be issued, would be issued after taking a decision on the increase in the staff strength.
A status report was directed to be filed within two months. Accordingly, this matter has been listed today for reporting compliance.
3. Today, Mr. Mahajan, ld. CGSC, appearing for the Respondents submits that a communication in respect of the said status has been received on 29th November 2021. The said communication dated 29th November, 2021 from the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (ES Cell), giving the status of the various appointments which are to be made at the adjudicating authority, has been shown to the Court. The same reads as under:
Name of post | Recent Development | |
1. | Chairperson | One of the Members of the Adjudicating Authority shall be appointed as its Chairperson, in this regard, a Selection Committee under the Chairmanship of RS met on 28.09.2021 and recommended one officer for the post of Chairperson in AA-PMLA. We have also taken approval of Finance Minister regarding appointment of the officer as Chairperson. File is to be submitted for ACC approval. |
2. | Member (Administration) | Vacancy circular has been published in the Employment News in their subscription dated 9th Oct- 15th Oct, 2021. The advertisement has also uploaded on the Department of Revenue official website. Last date for applying the |
3. | Member (Law) | Vacancy circular has been published in the Employment News in their subscription dated 9th Oct- 15th Oct, 2021. The advertisement has al |
The court emphasized the need for efficient functioning of the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA and directed the government to take steps to fill up vacant positions within specified timeframes.
The judgment established the principle that statutory remedies should be exhausted before seeking extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
(1) Appointments cannot be made over and above clear and anticipated vacancies which have been advertised even though Public Service Commission may have prepared a longer merit list than it was requi....
The adjudicating authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, can function with a single-member bench as per Section 6(5)(b) of the Act, which empowers the Chairperson to constitute ....
The appeal process to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 26 of the PMLA Act is available to persons aggrieved by an order made by the Adjudicating Authority.
A recruitment process initiated for specific vacancies cannot be expanded to include newly created posts post-facto. Such integration is impermissible as it distorts established reservation quotas an....
The court established that the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA, while exercising powers that may appear judicial, operates primarily as an administrative body, and its composition does not nece....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.