SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1592

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Raj Kumar Yadav & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India & Anr. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 13474 of 2021
Decided On : 29-11-2021

Important Points

The need for the Respondents to decide the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law, taking into account the judgment of the Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI

Subject

Employment Law - Promotion Disputes

Headnote

Promotion - Deprivation of Promotion Due to Defective Colour Vision - Court directs Respondents to decide representations filed by Petitioners within twelve weeks in accordance with law and take into account the judgment of the Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners seek promotion and payment of consequential benefits due to deprivation of promotion as constables with BSF, citing a Division Bench judgment of the Court

Finding of the Court:

The Court directs the Respondents to decide the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law, taking into account the judgment of the Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI, without commenting on the merit of the controversy

Issues: Deprivation of promotion due to defective colour vision, failure to receive response to representations filed by the Petitioners

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasizes the need for the Respondents to decide the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law, taking into account the judgment of the Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI

Final Decision: The Court disposes of the present writ petition by directing the Respondents to decide the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law, without commenting on the merit of the controversy

Advocates appeared:
A.K.Mishra, Advocate, Gigi C George, Advocate, Reshesh M.Tripathi, Advocate, Hemendra Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - C.M.No.42482/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.13474/2021

1. By way of the present petition, Petitioners seek promotion as well as payment of all the consequential benefits in accordance with a Division Bench judgment of this Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI , W.P.(C) 361/2013 dated 28th February, 2013.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners, who are constables with BSF have been deprived of promotion due to defective colour vision. He states the Petitioners have made several representations to DG, Force Headquarters, but have not received any response.

3. Issue notice. Mr.Gigi C George, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents. He states that the Respondents shall dispose of the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks.

4. Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court disposes of the present writ petition by directing the Respondents to decide the representations filed by the Petitioners within twelve weeks by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law. Needless to state, the Respondents shall take into account the judgment of this Court in R C Mandi Vs UOI (supra). However, this Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merit of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left oepn.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top