SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1151

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.
Tejinder Pal Singh - Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2150/2021
Decided On : 03-09-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Ms. Riya Gulati, Mr. Himanshu Bidhuri and Mr. Jasdeep S. Dhillon, Advocats, for the Petitioner; Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Dinesh Beniwal, PS R.K. Puram, for the State; Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Kamal R. Digpaul, Advocate, for the UOI

The main legal point established is that the necessity of custodial interrogation and the presence of evidence linking foreign travel to illegal activities are crucial factors in determining the grant of anticipatory bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Sections 420/468/471 IPC - [Section 438 Cr.P.C., Sections 420/468/471 IPC]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of furnishing false information, suppressing information regarding criminal cases, and furnishing fake/forged documents to obtain passports.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the necessity of custodial interrogation and the petitioner's foreign travel did not involve any illegal activities detrimental to the security of the State. The court allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Issues: The issues revolved around the authenticity of documents submitted for obtaining passports, the petitioner's criminal background, and the necessity of custodial interrogation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that the prosecution's failure to demonstrate the need for custodial interrogation and the absence of evidence linking the petitioner's foreign travel to illegal activities were crucial factors in granting anticipatory bail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the petitioner's release on anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to join the investigation when called by the Investigating Officer.

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. - The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 10/2021 under Section 420/468/471 IPC registered at P.S. R.K. Puram, New Delhi.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the present case are that initially one Avtar Singh Sunner S/o Tarsem Singh R/o ward No. 9, 11G, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan had filed a complaint against petitioner Tejinder Pal Singh which was received at SP office Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan from passport office Jaipur for enquiry.

3. It has been alleged in that complaint that the petitioner is a history-sheeter of PS Kotwali, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan and he has been involved in activities with Bhinderwala and has also been in jail. His photo is also in police station and despite this he has passports from Delhi and Jaipur. It is also alleged that the passport issued from Jaipur got renewed and the petitioner is travelling abroad. Complainant Avatar Singh demanded an enquiry that how a history-sheeter got a passport and renewed it.

4. The said complaint was sent to SHO PS. Kotwali, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan Vide SP office, letter Dt. 29.08.2018 for enquiry which was conducted by E.O. ASI Lal Bahadur Chander PS Kotwali. As per enquiry report, petitioner Tejinder Pal Singh S/o Surjit Singh is basically a resident of H.N. 416, Vinoba Basti, Sri Ganganagr Rajasthan and presently, has been residing at H.N. 619 in the same locality since 2011. He has criminal back ground and has been involved in criminal activities since 1983. He was declared history-sheeter of PS Kotwali in 1992 and due to observation on him for being a history-sheeter, it was not possible for him to get any passport at his above address. But he concealed these facts and applied for a passport in 2005 at Passport Office, Bhikaji Cama Place, Delhi while showing himself a permanent resident of 3rd floor, H.N. 407, New Rajender Nagar, Delhi, actually the resident of his sister-in-law namely Mis Manju Tehri W/o Kailash. With passport application form, he produced a forged/edited voter card of Delhi, bearing No. DL/07/067/12409 Dt. 29.12.1995 showing his name and photograph on it and a fake school transfer certificate of Govt. School, Bibirani. Alwar, Rajasthan. After enquiry both documents were found forged and it came to notice that voter ID card that he edited actually belongs to Kailash S/o Hukumchand, (husband of Manju). On the basis of above false information and forged/fabricated documents provided by the petitioner, he was issued passport No. F2911333 valid from 30.03.2005 to 29.03.2015, by passport office, Bhikaji Cama Place, Delhi. After expiry of the above passport, he got a new passport bearing No. N5299438 dt. 30.11.2015 from Jaipur Passport Office, at his actual address i.e. H.N. 619, Vinoba Basti, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan in continuation to the previous passport.

5. After enquiry, having found the jurisdiction of Delhi, the matter was sent to Superintendent, Regional Passport Office (RPO), Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram Delhi by SP, Sri Ganganagar vide its office letter dt. 17.6.2019. Further. Mr. Suresh Yadav, Senior Superintendent (Policy), Regional Passport Officer, Delhi filed a complaint dt.

15.12.2020 to the DCP, South West Delhi for registration of FIR against the petitioner for furnishing false information, suppressing information regarding criminal case(s) registered against him and furnishing fake/forged tempered documents. The complaint was received at PS RK Puram, Delhi for further legal action.

6. In his complaint, he alleged that petitioner was issued passport No. F2911333 dt. 30.03.2005 from RPO, RK Puram, Delhi, on the basis of a clear Police Verification Report. Further, he alleged that Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar. Rajasthan, conducted an investigation against petitioner Tejinder Pal Singh on the complaint of one Mr. Avtar Singh and as per investigation report of SP, Sri Ganganagar, the petitioner was found of cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top