SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1186

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Central Bureau Of Investigation - Appellant
Versus
M/s Bhushan Power And Steel Limited (bpsl) & Ors. - Respondents
Crl.M.C. No. 1724/2020
Decided On : 11-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma, SPP, Mr. Prakarsh Airan and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates, for the Appellant, Mr. Manmeet Singh and Ms. Nishtha Chaturvedi, Advocates, for the Respondent.

Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 allows an officer below the requisite rank to assist the Investigating Officer under direct supervision, and the responsibility of all steps remains with the officer in charge of the investigation.

Headnote:

Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Investigation - 120-B, 420, 468, 471, 477A IPC, Section 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act, 1988

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought permission for Sub Inspector Amit Kumar to assist the main Investigating Officer in a high-ticket fraud case. The Trial Court declined the application based on the interpretation of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Finding of the Court:

The Trial Court's decision was found to be contrary to the mandate of Section 17 of the PC Act, 1988, which allows an officer below the requisite rank to assist the Investigating Officer under direct supervision.

Issues: The issue involved was whether a person below the rank of Inspector can assist the main Investigating Officer in conducting investigation, based on the interpretation of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the responsibility of all steps remains with the officer in charge of the investigation, and the subordinate officer must work under direct supervision. The court cited previous cases to support the interpretation of Section 17.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the Trial Court's decision was overturned based on the correct interpretation of Section 17 of the PC Act, 1988.

ORDER

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral). - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking setting aside of the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by learned Special Judge (PC Act), CBI-20, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi whereby the petitioner's application seeking permission for Sub Inspector Amit Kumar to assist the main Investigating Officer in conducting investigation, was declined.

2. Learned SPP for CBI has submitted that the present case bearing RCBD12019E0002 was registered under Section 120-B read with Sections 420/468/471/477A IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(l)(d) of the PC Act, 1988 on 05.04.2019 against the respondent company and others. It is submitted that the officials of the respondent company entered into a criminal conspiracy in order to cheat banks/financial institutions/Govt. exchequer, dishonestly and fraudulently diverted huge amount of bank funds.

3. It is further submitted that the main Investigating Officer Insp. Kapil Dhanked has been investigating other cases and also looking proceedings pending before different Courts including this Court as well as the Supreme Court of India. The present case is a high-ticket fraud requiring investigation all over the country. Further, the application in question was moved before the Trial Court seeking permission for 57 Amit Kumar to assist Insp. Kapil Dhanked in conducting investigation as the bank documents are stated to be voluminous and the investigation is to be conducted speedily.

4. Ms. Nishtha Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that without prejudice to their rights and contentions to challenge the entire investigation in appropriate proceedings for being contrary to mandate of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC"), the respondents have no objection to the prayer made in the present application. She has informed that on an application filed by the Punjab National Bank under Section 7 of the IBC, the NCLT had initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Subsequently, the NCLAT has also approved the Resolution Plan, which now has been implemented on 26.03.2021, when the new management has taken over.

5. I have heard learned counsels for the parties.

6. In the present case, so far, the investigation has been conducted by Insp. Kapil Dhanked. It has been stated that the documents are voluminous and the investigation is to be carried out all over India for which reason, Insp. Kapil Dhanked would need the assistance of 57 Amit Kumar.

7. The short issue involved in the present case is whether a person below the rank of Inspector can assist the main Investigating Officer in conducting investigation. The issue in question arises out of interpretation of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which is contained in Chapter IV of the Act dealing with investigation into cases under the Act as well as for the persons who are authorised to investigate and it reads as under:

    "17. Persons authorised to investigate- Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), no police officer below the rank, -

    (a) in the case of the Delhi Special Police establishment, of an Inspector of Police;

    (b) in the metropolitan areas of Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and Ahmedabad and in any other metropolitan area notified as such under sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), of an Assistant Commissioner of Police;

    (c) Elsewhere, of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or a police officer of equivalent rank, shall investigate any offence punishable under this Act without the order of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class, as the case may be, or make any arrest therefore without a warrant:

    Provided that if a police officer not below the rank of an Inspector of Police is authorised by the State Government in this behalf by general or special order, he may also investigate any such offence without the order of a Metrop

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top