SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1068

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Religare Enterprises Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (earlier National Eassessment Centre Delhi) & Anr. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 5631 of 2021; C.M. Appl No. 17539 of 2021
Decided On : 29-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Ajay Vohra, Advocate, Rohit Jain, Advocate, Aniket D Agrawal, Advocate, Puneet Rai, Advocate

The court emphasized the importance of granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing as required by Section 144B(7) of the Income Tax Act, and held that the failure to do so violated the principles of natural justice and the mandatory procedure under the Faceless Assessment Scheme.

Headnote:

Faceless Assessment Scheme - Violation of Principles of Natural Justice - Section 143(3) and 144B - [ASSESSMENT ORDER] - [INCOME TAX] - [Section 143(3), Section 144B(7), Section 144B(9)] - The court found that the impugned assessment order violated the principles of natural justice and the mandatory procedure prescribed in the Faceless Assessment Scheme and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act. The court set aside the assessment order, demand notice, and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings, and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer to grant the petitioner an opportunity of hearing by way of Video Conferencing and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petition challenged the Assessment Order dated 24th May 2021 passed by the Respondent No.1 under section 143(3) read with section 144B for Assessment Year [AY] 2018-19, notice of demand issued under section 156 as well as notice for initiation of penalty proceeding under section 270A of the Act and all proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the impugned assessment order violated the principles of natural justice and the mandatory procedure prescribed in the Faceless Assessment Scheme and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.

Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice, mandatory procedure under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner should have been granted an opportunity of hearing by way of Video Conferencing before the assessment order was passed, as required by Section 144B(7) of the Act.

Final Decision: The impugned assessment order, demand notice, and notice for initiation of penalty proceedings for the assessment year 2018-19 were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to grant the petitioner an opportunity of hearing by way of Video Conferencing and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Assessment Order dated 24th May 2021 passed by the Respondent No.1 under section 143(3) read with section 144B for Assessment Year [AY] 2018-19, notice of demand issued under section 156 as well as notice for initiation of penalty proceeding under section 270A of the Act and all proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.

3. Learned senior counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent No.1 issued show cause notice requiring the Petitioner to show-cause by 23:59 hours on 25th April 2021 as to why assessment should not be completed as per draft assessment order. He further states that considering that the issues were numerous and factual, the Petitioner in response to the show-cause notice-cum-draft assessment order, made specific request for personal hearing under the specific tab/ column 'VC' in terms of Section 144B(7)(vii)-(ix) of the Act on the e-filing portal to make oral submissions providing necessary explanation and clarifications which was neither granted, nor rejected by Respondent No. 1.

4. He points out that the Respondent disposed of the detailed legal and factual objections submitted by the Petitioner in a mechanical manner and denied the request for personal hearing without specifying any reason, thereby resulting in blatant violation of the statutory provisions of Section 143(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] and principles of natural justice.

5. Per contra, Mr. Puneet Rai, learned senior standing counsel for respondents submits that the expression used in clause (vii) of sub-Section (7) of Section 144B of the Act is 'may' and not 'shall' and, therefore, there is no vested right in the petitioner to claim a personal hearing.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that Section 144B (7) provides for an opportunity of personal hearing, if requested, by the assessee. The relevant portions of Section 144B (7) and Section 144B (9) are reproduced hereinbelow:

    "144B. Faceless assessment -

      (1) xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

        (7) For the purposes of faceless assessment-

          xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

            (vii) in a case where a variation is proposed in the draft assessment order or final draft assessment order or revised draft assessment order, and an opportunity is provided to the assessee by serving a notice calling upon him to show-cause as to why the assessment should not be completed as per the such draft or final draft or revised draft assessment order, the assessee or his authorised representative, as the case may be, may request for personal hearing so as to make his oral submissions or present his case before the income-tax authority in any unit;

              (viii) the Chief Commissioner or the Director General, in charge of the Regional Faceless Assessment Centre, under which the concerned unit is set up, may approve the request for personal hearing referred to in clause (vii) if he is of the opinion that the request is covered by the circumstances referred to in sub-clause (h) of clause (xii);

                xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

                  (xii) the Principal Chief Commissioner or the Principal Director General, in charge of the National Faceless Assessment Centre shall, with the prior approval of the Board, lay down the standards, procedures and processes for effective functioning of the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Regional Faceless Assessment Centres and the unit set up, in an automated and mechanised environment, including format, mode, procedure and processes in respect of the following, namely: -

                    xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

                      (h) circumstances in which personal hearing referred to clause

                        (viii) shall be approved;.....

                          xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

                            (9) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, assessment made under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144 in the cases referred to in subsection (2) [other than the cases transferred under sub-section (8)], on or after the

                                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                      1
                                      2
                                      3
                                      4
                                      5
                                      6
                                      7
                                      8
                                      9
                                      10
                                      11
                                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                      supreme today icon
                                      logo-black

                                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                      Please visit our Training & Support
                                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                      qr

                                      Scan Me!

                                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                      whatsapp-icon Back to top