IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Naresh Kumar Goyal - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 6245 of 2021; C.M. Appls No. 19753 of 2021, 19754 of 2021
Decided On : 12-07-2021
Violation of Principles of Natural Justice - Income Tax - Section 143(3), Section 144B - Summary: The court set aside the assessment order and notices issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-2019, as they were passed without granting the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing, which is provided for under Section 144B(7). The court emphasized that the use of the word 'may' in the provision does not absolve the revenue from the obligation to consider the request for a personal hearing. The court held that the respondent/revenue must frame standards, procedures, and processes for approving requests for personal hearings, and since no such standards were in place, the impugned orders were set aside. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to grant the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the assessment order and notices issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-2019, alleging violation of principles of natural justice without affording the petitioner due opportunity of being heard.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned assessment order and notices were passed without granting the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing as envisaged under Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Act, and emphasized the obligation of the revenue to consider the request for a personal hearing and to frame standards, procedures, and processes for approving such requests.
Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice, denial of opportunity for personal hearing, interpretation of Section 144B(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the use of the word 'may' in Section 144B(7)(vii) does not absolve the revenue from the obligation to consider the request for a personal hearing. It emphasized the need for the revenue to frame standards, procedures, and processes for approving requests for personal hearings.
Final Decision: The impugned assessment order and notices were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to grant the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 20th May 2021 issued by Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short 'the Act'] for Assessment Year 2018-2019 and notice of demand dated 20th May, 2021. Petitioner also challengesthe show cause notice and draft assessment order both dated 19th April, 2021, penalty notice dated 20th May, 2021 under Section 274 read with Section 271AAC(1) of the Act issued by Respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the impugned assessment order and notices have been passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice without affording the petitioner due opportunity of being heard.
4. He states that the show cause notice dated 19th April, 2021 required the Petitioner to make compliance within 48 hoursi.e. by 21s t April, 2021 despite the fact that Covid-19 was at its peak at that time and there was a lockdown imposed in the NCT of Delhi by the Delhi Disaster Management Authority, Government of NCT of Delhi.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the impugned Assessment order has been passed without granting an opportunity for personal hearing as envisagedunder Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Act even though it was specifically sought by the Petitioner vide letter dated 21st April, 2021 in response to show cause notice dated 19th April, 2021.
6. He emphasises that the Respondent No.6 denied the opportunity of personal hearing merely for the reason that such request was made by the Petitioner through his reply filed on 21st April 2021 and not through the link provided in the show cause notice dated 19th April 2021 despite the fact that no such link was provided in the show cause notice dated 19th April, 2021 as well as no manner of making the request for personal hearing was prescribed in the show cause notice dated 19th April, 2021 and no guidelines or instructions have been issued under the Act or Rules to such effect.
7. Learned counsel for the Petitioner relies on various orders passed by this Court in matters with similar facts wherein this Court has set aside the assessment orders that had been passed by the Revenue/Respondent without granting an opportunity of being heard. (Ritnand Balved Education Foundation (Umbrella Organization of Amity Group of Institution) v NFAC W.P. (C) 5537/2021 dated 27th May, 2021, Sanjay Aggarwal v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi, W.P. (C) 5741/2021 dated 02nd June, 2021, Naina Lal Kidwai v.NFAC Delhi W.P.(C) 5775/2021 dated 03rd June, 2021, Lemon Tree Hotels Limited v NFAC Delhi W.P(C) 5427/2021 dated 21st May, 2021).
8. Issue notice.
9. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 7.
10. Mr.Sharma states that the expression used in clause (vii) of subsection (7) of Section 144Bof the Act is 'may' and not 'shall' and therefore, there is no vested right in the petitioner to claim a personal hearing.
11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that Section 144B (7) provides for a personal hearing. The relevant portion of Section 144B (7) is reproduced hereinbelow:-
"144B. Faceless assessment
(1) xxx xxx xxx
(7) For the purposes of faceless assessment-
xxx xxx xxx
(vii) in a case where a variation is proposed in the draft assessment order or final draft assessment order or revised draft assessment order, and an opportunity is provided to the assessee by serving a notice calling upon him to show-cause as to why the assessment should not be completed as per the such draft or final draft or revised draft assessment order, the assessee or his authorised representative, as the case may be, may request for personal hearing so as to make his oral submissions or present his case before the income-tax authority in any unit;
(viii)
The court emphasized the obligation of the revenue to consider the request for a personal hearing and to frame standards, procedures, and processes for approving such requests under Section 144B(7) o....
The failure to grant a personal hearing during assessments constitutes a violation of natural justice, mandating the setting aside of the impugned orders.
The court upheld the necessity of granting a personal hearing under Section 144B(7) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that natural justice principles must be respected in assessment processes.
The court emphasized the importance of granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing as required by Section 144B(7) of the Income Tax Act, and held that the failure to do so violated the principl....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to provide an opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee as per the provisions of Section 144B (7) and the mandatory proced....
Procedural fairness in tax assessment necessitates consideration of an assessee's request for a personal hearing under the Income Tax Act.
A taxpayer's request for a personal hearing under Section 144B must be considered by the revenue authority, and failure to do so violates natural justice, rendering the assessment order null.
The court ruled that the failure to provide a personal hearing upon request in the faceless assessment process violated principles of natural justice, rendering the assessment order invalid.
The obligation of the revenue to consider the request for a personal hearing and the absence of framed standards, procedures, and processes for dealing with such requests.
Failure to grant an opportunity of personal hearing as required under Section 144B(7) constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice and the mandatory procedure under the Faceless Asses....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.