SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Anikit Sood & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(CRL) 776/2021
Decided On : 07-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv, for the Petitioner; Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with W/SI Surbhi Aggarwal PS Paschim Vihar, for the Respondents; in person, for the Respondent No. 2

The court can quash FIR and consequent proceedings in a matrimonial dispute if the parties have entered into an amicable settlement and the complainant is unwilling to prosecute the matter further.

Headnote:

Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - The court quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties entered into an amicable settlement before the Family Courts, Delhi.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought direction for quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had entered into an amicable settlement before the Family Courts, Delhi.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the settlement between the parties and the complainant's submission, concluded that no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further, and thus quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute the matter further.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings.

JUDGMENT

(Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No. 367/2019 dated 01.07.2019 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 16.02.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 06.07.2018.

5. Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi vide compromise-cum-settlement deed dated 25.09.2020 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. Complainant is present in person and has been identified by W/SI Surabhi Aggarwal of Police Station Paschim Vihar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 367/2019 dated 01.07.2019 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

9. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top