Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Vikas Rathi – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes leads to quash of fir. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. court quashes fir due to lack of purpose in prosecution. (Para 9) |
| 3. court orders quashing of fir and proceedings. (Para 10) |
| 4. petition allowed and disposed of. (Para 11) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
Crl. M.A. 2853/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 574/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.39/2019 dated 15.02.2019 registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 22.06.2018 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 24.07.2018.
7. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relati
An FIR can be quashed when the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Parties can amicably settle disputes, and such settlements justify quashing of FIRs, especially in cases stemming from personal issues.
The court can quash FIR and consequent proceedings in a matrimonial dispute if the parties have entered into an amicable settlement and the complainant is unwilling to prosecute the matter further.
Amicable settlements in family disputes can lead to quashing of FIRs when the parties express a desire to discontinue prosecution, emphasizing judicial economy and the significance of resolving confl....
An FIR can be quashed if both parties have entered into a mutually agreed settlement and the complainant no longer wishes to pursue the case, demonstrating that prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An FIR can be quashed if the parties amicably settle their disputes and the complainant no longer wishes to proceed with prosecution.
Amicable settlement between parties can justify quashing of FIR, especially when the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
The court can quash an FIR when the parties settle the dispute amicably and the complainant does not wish to pursue the case.
In cases of personal disputes resolved amicably, continuing prosecutions serve no purpose, allowing for the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
A settled dispute between parties, coupled with the complainant's wish not to pursue charges, justifies quashing of the FIR to serve no public interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
