SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Tapasya Shiksha Samiti - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 9368 of 2020
Decided On : 06-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Asheesh Jain, Advocate, Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate, Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Lack of diligence in complying with regulatory requirements can lead to the dismissal of a petition.

Headnote:

Consent of Affiliation - Establishment of New Ayurveda Medical College - Regulations 6(1)(d) and 7 of the Establishment of New Medical College, Opening of New of Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity by a Medical College Regulations, 2019 - The court discussed the requirement of obtaining a consent of affiliation for establishing a new medical college from a university and the scrutiny process by the Central Government under Regulation 7. The petitioner's lack of diligence in ensuring timely submission of the consent of affiliation led to the dismissal of the petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the rejection of its application for permission to establish a new Ayurveda medical college for the academic year 2021-22, citing the delay in obtaining the consent of affiliation from the University.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner failed to ensure timely submission of the consent of affiliation as required by the Regulations, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Issues: Delay in obtaining and submitting the consent of affiliation, compliance with the Regulations for establishing a new medical college.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's lack of diligence in ensuring timely submission of the consent of affiliation as required by the Regulations led to the dismissal of the petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition, along with the pending applications, was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. - The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

    CM APPLs. 30200-30201/2020 (for exemptions)

      Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

        These applications stand disposed of.

          W.P.(C) 9368/2020 and CM APPL. 30199/2020 (for interim relief)

            1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails an order of the respondent No. 1-Union of India ["UOI"] dated 05.10.2020, by which the petitioner's application for permission to establish a new Ayurveda medical college in the academic year 2021-22 was rejected and returned by the UOI.

            2. The contention of the petitioner is that it had obtained a No Objection Certificate ["NOC"] from the Government of Madhya Pradesh on 26.04.2017, for setting up of new Ayurveda college in Bhopal with an intake of 100 students in the undergraduate BAMS course. The petitioner's applications for permission to establish the college in the years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 were rejected for various reasons. According to the petitioner, for each of the aforesaid three academic years, it had submitted valid consents of affiliation from the Madhya Pradesh Medical Science University, Jabalpur ["the University"].

            3. As far as the year 2021-22 is concerned, the UOI extended the last date for submission of applications from the normally prescribed last date of 31.08.2020 to 30.09.2020 in view of the COVID-19 pandemic. The petitioner submitted its application on 29.08.2020.

            4. At the stage of submission of the application, the petitioner annexed a certificate obtained from the University dated 28.08.2020, to the effect that the petitioner had applied for valid consent of affiliation for opening of the college for the session 2021-22. It was further certified that an inspection had been conducted by the local inquiry committee and that the consent of affiliation of the petitioner-college would be communicated after the meeting of Executive Council of the University, which was to be held in the month of September 2020.

            5. The UOI, however, rejected the petitioner's application vide the impugned communication dated 05.10.2020 for want of a valid consent of affiliation from the University for the academic year 2021-

            6. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this rejection was unwarranted in the circumstances of the case as the petitioner had, in fact, obtained the consent of affiliation of the University on 25.09.2020, prior to the last date of 30.09.2020. A copy of the consent of affiliation dated 25.09.2020, has also been annexed to the writ petition. Mr. Malik further submits that the aforesaid document was sent directly by the University to the UOI. In support thereof, he has produced an extract from the despatch register maintained by the University administration [Annexure P-15 to the writ petition].

            7. Mr. Asheesh Jain, learned counsel for the UOI, however, submits that the consent of affiliation was neither submitted by the petitioner alongwith its application nor received by the UOI in time, i.e. prior to the last date of 30.09.2020. He submits that the aforesaid despatch register and a communication of the University dated 21.10.2020 (Annexure P-14 to the writ petition) disclose that the consent of affiliation was, in fact, despatched by the University only on 25.09.2020, and that too, by ordinary post. Mr. Jain submits that in the absence of the consent of affiliation, the petitioner was ineligible for grant of the permission sought, and in fact, the UOI was not required to forward its application to the Central Council of Indian Medicine ["CCIM"] for inspection and recommendation. In this connection, Mr. Jain cites Regulations 6(1)(d) and 7 of the Establishment of New Medical College, Opening of New of Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity by a Medical College Regulations, 2019 ["the Regulations"], which provide as follows:-

              "6. Eligibility for making an a

                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                            1
                            2
                            3
                            4
                            5
                            6
                            7
                            8
                            9
                            10
                            11
                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                            supreme today icon
                            logo-black

                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                            Please visit our Training & Support
                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                            qr

                            Scan Me!

                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                            whatsapp-icon Back to top