SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Career Convent Educational and Charitable Trust - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1846 of 2021, W.P.(C) 1923 of 2021 & CM Appl. 5603 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 1924 of 2021
Decided On : 03-08-2021




The doctrine of substantial compliance allows applications to be considered valid despite minor deficiencies, provided essential regulatory intents are met. Courts emphasize a diligent effort to comply, particularly in administrative contexts.

Headnote:(A) Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Section 13A - Establishment of new Ayurveda medical colleges - Applications made by petitioners rejected by Union of India on grounds of incomplete documentation; petitioners obtained Consents of Association after the closing date - Substantial compliance doctrine applicable - Consents, although initially non-compliant, effectively communicated intent and eligibility to affiliate - Court held that rejection based on minor deficiencies was unreasonable. (Paras 21-24, 39-41)

(B) Legal requirements - Timeliness of submission of application documents is imperative, yet flexibility exists in evaluating the intent and substantial adherence to requirements - Diligence of petitioners noted; their applications directed for further review. (Paras 27-30, 38)

Facts of the case:
The petitions involved applications for establishing Ayurveda medical colleges by three trusts. Two of the trusts submitted applications with documents that were later deemed non-compliant, while one trust failed to include required consent at initial filing but demonstrated diligence in subsequent submissions.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the rejections by the Union of India of the applicants' submissions were unreasonable given their efforts to comply with regulatory demands.

Issues: Whether the requirements of eligibility were substantively met despite minor deficiencies and the implications of timeliness in document submissions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the doctrine of substantial compliance, stressing that minor deficiencies should not outweigh substantial fulfillment of eligibility criteria aimed at furthering permissible educational establishments.

Result: Petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. legal framework for establishing medical colleges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of applications submitted by petitioners (Para 7 , 10 , 11)
3. arguments asserting compliance of documents submitted (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
4. respondents' defense against applicants' claims (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court's analysis on documentation errors (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. doctrine of substantial compliance in legal applications (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
7. impact of timing on noc submission (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
8. court's directive to authorities regarding applicants' considerations (Para 38 , 39)
9. final ruling in favor of petitioners (Para 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT W.P.(C) 1846/2021 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 24

Prateek Jalan, J. The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. These three petitions are directed against orders of the Union of India [hereinafter, "UOI"] rejecting applications made by the petitioners for permission to establish new Ayurveda medical colleges under Section 13A of the Indian MEDICINE CENTRAL COUNCIL ACT , 1970 [hereinafter, "the Act"]. As the three petitions raise substantially similar legal issues, they have been taken up for hearing together and are disposed of by this common judgment.

I. Background and regulatory provisions

2. The issue in these petitions revolves around the documentation required to be submitted alongwith an application under Section 13A of the Act.

3. Section 13A deals with permission for establishment of a new medical college or a new course of study. It requires previous permission of the Central Government to be obtained. The Central Government, upon receipt of an application under Section 13A, refers it to the Central Council of Indian Medicine [hereinafter, "CCIM"] for its recommendation, and may approve or disapprove after obtaining the recommendation of the CCIM.

4. The Establishment of New Medical College, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and Increase of Admission Capacity by a Medical College Regulations, 2019 [hereinafter, "the Regulations"] were framed on 11.07.2019, in exercise of the regulation making power conferred by Section 36 of the Act. The Regulations require submission of various documents alongwith the application under Section 13A, including a No Objection Certificate [hereinafter, "NOC"] from the State Government, and a Consent of Affiliation [hereinafter, "COA"] from the affiliating university of the proposed college. These are to be in Form-4 and Form-5 appended to the Regulations, respectively.

5. Regulations 6(1)(c), 6(1)(d) and 7(1) are relevant for adjudication of these petitions:

    "6. Eligibility for making an application.-(1)For making an application under sub-regulation (1) of regulation 4, a person shall be eligible if,-

    xxxx xxxx xxxx

    (c) has obtained 'No Objection Certificate' in Form- 4 from the concerned State Government for establishing a new medical college at the proposed site;

    (d) has obtained a 'Consent of Affiliation' in Form- 5 for establishing a new medical college from a University established under any Central or State statute;

    xxxx xxxx xxxx

    7. Recommendation of Central Council. - (1) The Central Government, after receipt of the applications shall W.P.(C) 1846/2021 & Other Connected Matters Page 4 of 24 scrutinized the application on the basic of eligibility criteria like Application Fee, No Objection Certificate of the State Government and Consent of Affiliation of the University etc. and the Central Government shall forward only eligible applications to the Central Council of Indian Medicine for further consideration and the ineligible and incomplete applications shall be rejected and returned to the applicants by the Central Government."

6. Although August 31 is normally the last date for submission of applications under Section 13A in respect of permissions for the following year, in view of the Coronavirus pandemic, the UOI extended the last date for submission of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top