SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Dr. Indraneel Mittra - Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 4513 of 2021; C.M. Appl No. 13797 of 2021, 13798 of 2021
Decided On : 17-05-2021

Advocates appeared:
Priyadeep, Advocate, Sriharsha Peechara, Advocate

The court emphasized the significance of considering objections and relevant documents filed by the petitioner in the assessment process, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned assessment order and remit the matter for a fresh assessment.

Headnote:

Assessment Order - Remittal for Fresh Assessment - The court set aside the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the respondent Corporation to pass a fresh assessment order after considering the objections and documents filed by the petitioner and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the assessment order, citing non-consideration of relevant tenancy documents and objections filed by the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the respondent Corporation for a fresh assessment order, considering the objections and documents filed by the petitioner and providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Issues: Non-consideration of relevant tenancy documents and objections filed by the petitioner in the assessment order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of considering the objections and relevant documents filed by the petitioner in the assessment process, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned assessment order and remit the matter for a fresh assessment.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the impugned assessment order was set aside, with the matter remitted to the respondent Corporation for a fresh assessment order.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns assessment order dated 16.12.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned assessment order relies on several notices including notice dated 17.03.2012 which notice was was challenged by the petitioner in W.P(C) 2577/2012 and the said notice was quashed by order dated 25.07.2012.

3. Learned counsel further submits that the assessment order records that the rent agreements with the tenants have not been furnished, however, the order records that in case the petitioner were to submit the documents of tenancy, the respondents would reconsider the matter. She submits that petitioner has submitted the relevant tenancy documents to the respondents after the passing of the impugned order.

4. Learned counsel further points out that the impugned order records that after receipt of the notices referred therein no objections were filed by the petitioner, however, objections were duly filed and copies of the same are annexed as Annexure 7 (Colly) to this petition and said objections have not been considered.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents under instructions submits that impugned order dated 16.12.2020 shall be withdrawn without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and the department would reassess the case of the petitioner and pass a fresh assessment order after taking into consideration the objections filed by the petitioner and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

6. In view of the above, impugned order dated 16.12.2020 is set aside. Matter is remitted to the respondent Corporation to pass a fresh assessment order after taking into account the objections and the documents filed by the petitioner and given an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.

7. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. This is also without prejudice to the plea of limitation being taken by the petitioner.

8. Petition is allowed in the above terms.

9. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top