SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rakesh Khanna – Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the case regarding assessment order (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding issuance of assessment order and lack of communication (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observations on the procedural deficiencies (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. ratio decidendi on quashing of the impugned order (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 21)
5. conclusion and final order of the court (Para 19 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks quashing of assessment order dated 26.11.2020, notice of demand dated 04.03.2021 and warrants of attachment dated 23.03.2021, issued by the respondent/Council.

3. By the impugned assessment order dated 26.11.2020, the rateable value of Rs.1,62,000/- has been enhanced with effect from 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2010 to Rs.3,37,05,600/- and from 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2013 to Rs.3,87,61,400/-, from 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2016 to Rs.4,45,75,600/-, from 01.04.2016 to 31.03.2019 to Rs.5,12,62,000/- and from 01.04.2019 onwards to Rs.5,89,51,300/-.

4. By impugned notice of demand dated 04.03.2021, petitioner has been directed to deposit a sum of Rs.17,40,73,412/-. Further, by wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top