IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Arun Attri - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Anr - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil)) No. 945 of 2021
Decided On : 19-04-2021
Medical Unfitness - Airmen Recruitment - Central Airmen Selection Board - Medical Certificate dated 25.01.2020 and 19.02.2020 - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Airmen in Group X & Y category and cleared the Written Test and Physical and Efficiency Test. However, he was declared medically unfit during the Medical Test. He sought a review medical examination, which was declined, leading to the filing of the present petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was aware of the reasons for his medical unfitness, had attended the Appeal Medical Board, and that the opinion of the Central Airmen Selection Board's medical specialist should be preferred over that of a civilian doctor.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's claim of unjustified medical unfitness, lack of supply of medical papers, and the refusal of a review medical examination.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the Armed Forces recruiting physically fit candidates and preferred the opinion of the Force's medical specialists over civilian doctors.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the original medical documents were returned to the respondents.
JUDGMENT
Asha Menon, J. - The petitioner had applied to the post of Airmen in Group X & Y category in the month of July, 2019 pursuant to the Notification issued by the Central Airmen Selection Board, IAF. He cleared the Written Test (Phase-I) as well as the Physical and Efficiency Test (PhaseII) of the recruitment process. However, when he was asked to appear in the Medical Test (Phase-III) on 25th January, 2020, he was declared medically unfit. The petitioner claimed that he had been given a remark of temporary unfit without any justification or explanation of the medical deficiency. He further claimed that he had got himself examined at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi ( AIIMS , for short), which issued him a certificate declaring him to be medically fit on 6 th March, 2020 (7th March, 2020 as per document), after conducting ECG examination. However, the Appeal Medical Board also declared him unfit on 19th February, 2020. This, the petitioner claimed, was unjustified. Further, he claimed that none of the medical papers were supplied to him, which has also caused prejudice to him and indicated arbitrary action on the part of the respondents. The petitioner claims that when he sought a further Review Medical Examination, it was declined unreasonably and hence, he has filed the present petition seeking the following reliefs: -
"(a) To pass directions to the Respondents for bringing on record the Impugned Medical Unfitness Certificate dated 25.01.2020 and 19.02.2020 issued by the Central Airmen Selection Board, Brar Square, New Delhi,
(b) To set aside the Impugned Medical Certificate(s) dated 25.01.2020 and 19.02.2020 (Copy of same never supplied to the petitioner)
(c) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to allow the Respondents to conduct re-medical exam. Alternatively, the Respondents to be directed for appointment of the Petitioner on the basis of the medical certificates issued by the Govt. Hospitals as mentioned above in the present Petition,
(d) To pass directions to the Respondents to pay the litigation cost as incurred by the Petitioner in filing of the Present Petition
(e) Issue any other/further direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts of the case."
2. On 2nd February, 2021, we passed the following order: -
"The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the medical certificate dated 25th January 2020 and 19th February, 2020 issued by the Central Airmen Selection Board, Brar Square, New Delhi.
It is the case of the petitioner that the aforesaid certificates have not been supplied to him. However, learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, has screen-shared report of the Medical Board dated 25th January, 2020 as well as the Report of the specialist dated 15th February, 2020 appointed by the Review Medical Board. He also states that the petitioner did not deliberately appear before the Review Medical Board though the Review Medical Board waited for the petitioner for one month. He has also screen-shared with the Court the receipt issued by the petitioner of the initial medical report dated 25th January, 2020. Let copies of the said documents be placed on record by the respondents after forwarding copies of the same to the counsel for the petitioner.
The aforesaid documents shall be e-mailed to both the court masters.
List on 17th February, 2021.
The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail."
3. On 17th February, 2021, the respondents were directed to re-file the documents. However, on 7 th April, 2021, the respondents produced the original medical documents in the court.
4. Ms. Ria Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner was entitled to a further review medical examination since the AIIMS had found him to be medically fit. She also contended that the medical documents produced bef
The importance of recruiting physically fit candidates for the Armed Forces and the preference of the Force's medical specialists' opinion over civilian doctors in such matters.
Court held that a military medical board's opinion on fitness is paramount over civilian assessments, affirming the necessity of maintaining stringent health standards in defense roles.
The court's decision was based on the findings of the medical file, including the repeat ECG test and consultation with a specialist doctor at the Appeal Medical Board, which determined the petitione....
The court confirmed that medical assessments conducted in accordance with established protocols can substantiate declarations of unfitness, even without new examinations if prior evaluations are prop....
The unhealed wound at the time of the medical examination rightfully disqualified the petitioner from selection.
The Appeal Medical Board's determination of medical unfitness prevails unless credible evidence of bias is presented; surgical corrections post-assessment do not automatically warrant re-evaluation.
Candidates for military service must meet prescribed medical standards, and choosing to appear for an Appeal Medical Board precludes further assessments unless procedural irregularities are demonstra....
Medical fitness determinations for military recruitment are authoritative and cannot be easily contested by private medical opinions, aligning with military standards in evaluations.
The finality of medical opinion provided by the authorities under the Rules of the Air Force and the limitations of opinions from private or other government doctors.
The medical opinions of recruitment agencies are final unless substantial error or mala fides are demonstrated; maintaining rigorous medical standards is essential for national security.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.