RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Rajender Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corporation And Ors – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petition impugns the order dated 11th December, 2019 of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi of dismissal of O.A. No. 4134/2014 preferred by the petitioner.
2. The said O.A. was preferred, contending that the benefit of III Financial Upgradation under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) for the Central Government Civilian Employees granted to the petitioner had not been correctly computed. It was the contention of the petitioner before CAT, that (a) he was in Pay Band-2 with Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- and the MACP benefit was granted by moving him to Pay Band-3 but with the same Grade Pay of Rs.5400/-; (b) the petitioner, on trifurcation of erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi, had been allocated to the respondent North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NrDMC), while some other batch mates of the petitioner had been allocated to South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) which had granted to them the benefit of MACP, by placing them in a Pay Band-3 with Grade Pay of Rs.6600/-.
3. Cat, in the impugned order has reasoned, that the benefit of MACP had been correctly computed and no fault can be found therewith. It has further been held
Basawaraj vs. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
Chandigarh Administration vs. Jagjit Singh
Dalip Singh vs. State of Haryana
Fuljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab
State of Haryana vs. Ram Kumar Mann
State of Orissa vs. Mamata Mohanty
Union of India vs. International Trading Co.
Union of India vs. M.K. Sarkar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.