Back
JAYANT NATH
Jagmohan Ratra – Appellant
Versus
Ampa Cycles Pvt Ltd & Anr – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jayant Nath, J. - I.A. Nos. 12625/2020 (u/O 39 R 1 & 2 CPC) & 1394/2021 (u/O 39 R 4 CPC)
1. I.A. 12625/2020 is filed by the plaintiff to restrain defendant No.1, its proprietors, directors, etc. from manufacturing, marketing, offering for sale, selling, advertising, etc. the impugned goods and services bearing the impugned marks AMPA and or any other mark which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff s trademark AMPA and logo so as to result in an act of passing off its goods and services as those of the plaintiff.
2. On 23.12.2020, this court had passed an interim order stating that defendant No.1, its proprietors, servants, directors, agents etc. are restrained from using the mark AMPA and the logo or any other mark which is deceptively similar to the plaintiff s mark AMPA with logo amounting to passing off its goods as that of the plaintiff. Defendant No.2 was restrained from using the domain name www.ampacycles.com till the next date of hearing.
3. I.A. 1394/2021 is filed by defendant No.1 seeking vacation of the said order dated 23.12.2020.
4. As per the accompanying suit, the plaintiff-Sh.Jagmohan Ratra is the sole proprietor of the firm concern-M/s Four Diamonds engaged
Passing off is a tort action that prevents misrepresentation of goods or services as those of another trader. Prima facie case of passing off requires elements such as misrepresentation, prospective ....
Passing off of trade mark - Proprietary rights - Interim injunction - Appellant/defendant company, even though it has started using trade mark ‘AMPA’ only in 2018, has established substantial sales a....
The court ruled that despite the plaintiff's prior usage claim, the distinct markets of the parties and lack of confusion led to the dismissal of the injunction request.
A plaintiff seeking an injunction must disclose all material facts; failure to do so may preclude equitable relief even if a prior user claim is made.
Concealment of material facts while obtaining ex parte injunction disentitles the plaintiff from equitable relief of injunction.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of prior use and the principles of honest adoption, delay, and acquiescence in trademark disputes.
The court affirmed the registered trademark holder's rights against similar marks and clarified standards for proving prior use and confusion under trademark law.
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
The trademark 'AMUL' is recognized as well-known and entitled to broad protection against identical or deceptively similar marks to prevent consumer confusion, irrespective of the goods involved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
