JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J.

I.A. No. 8998/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of CPC for ad-interim injunction)

1. Plaintiff, the registered proprietor of "CAMPUS"/"[IMG]"/"[IMG]"/"[IMG]"/"CAMP" and other formative versions thereof [hereinafter collectively, "Plaintiff's registered marks], is into the business of manufacturing wide-range of footwear, which are sold under the afore-said marks. Their grievance arises from Defendants' use of the registered mark "CAMPS", and its formative mark "[IMG]" [hereinafter collectively, "impugned marks"], which are also used in respect of footwear.

2. The suit is proceeding towards trial due to parties' inability to reach a settlement. Thus, through this judgement, the Court will determine Plaintiff's request for grant of an interlocutory injunction, pending final adjudication.

3. Let us first give a brief introduction to the parties as well as their respective reasons for selecting the conflicting trademarks, as enumerated in the pleadings and accompanying documents presented before Court. Plaintiff's predecessor-in-title adopted "CAMPUS" in 1990, and variations of the logos "[IMG]"/"[IMG]"/"[IMG]", in 1997. The rights in sai