IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Mohit Aggarwal - Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Application No. 2585 of 2020; Crl.M. (B) No. 8044 of 2020
Decided On : 16-03-2021
NDPS - Bail Application - Sections 8/22 & 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 67 of NDPS Act and its evidentiary value, the limitations on granting bail under Section 37 of NDPS Act, and the admissibility of confessional statements. The court emphasized the importance of voluntary statements, their admissibility, and the need for corroboration of evidence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was facing trial for offences under Sections 8/22 & 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution's case was based on the recovery of narcotic substances and voluntary statements made by the accused. The petitioner sought bail, claiming innocence and false implication.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's involvement was primarily based on his retracted statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act, and no incriminating material was recovered from him. The court emphasized the inadmissibility of the petitioner's statement and the need for corroboration of evidence.
Issues: The key issues were the admissibility and evidentiary value of the petitioner's retracted statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act, the limitations on granting bail under Section 37 of NDPS Act, and the need for corroboration of evidence in the absence of recovery of incriminating material.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's retracted statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act cannot be solely relied upon, and the prosecution needs to prove its case with corroborative evidence. The court also emphasized the fulfillment of requirements under Section 37 of NDPS Act for granting bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's bail application, emphasizing that the petitioner is not likely to commit an offence if released on bail, and directed his release on certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - In case SC No. SC/1334/2020, titled as NCB Vs. Gaurav Aggarwal & Ors, petitioner is facing trial for the offences under Sections 8/22 & 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Petitioner was arrested by the officials of Narcotic Control Bureau ("NCB") on 11.01.2020 and is in judicial custody since 11.01.2020. Vide present petition, petitioner is seeking bail while claiming to be innocent and of having been falsely implicated in the present case.
2. The present petition has been filed on the ground that petitioner is a law abiding citizen and is running business in the name of Madhav Pharma for sale, purchase and transport of various medicines while holding valid drug license under Form 20B & 21B of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1945. Petitioner has pleaded that he has maintained all records complying with all the terms and conditions of the license. Petitioner has further pleaded that no contraband was recovered from his possession and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
3. The crux of the prosecution case, as per complaint dated 09.01.2020, is that upon receipt of secret information by Chetan Sharma, Intelligence Officer (IO) that one parcel bearing Airway Bill No. D90471207, booked by one Gaurav Kumar from Agra for delivery to one Manoj Kumar, at Ludhiana, Punjab is lying at DTDC, Khasra No. 16/06, Smalakha, Kapasehra, New Delhi is suspected of containing NRX tablets and if captured, huge quantity of narcotic tablets can be recovered. This information was reduced into writing and was placed before Amit Kumar Tiwary, Superintendent, who directed Manoj Kumar, Junior Intelligence Officer, to constitute a team and take further action as per law. Thereafter, Manoj Kumar, Junior Intelligence Officer along with other members of the constituted raiding team, namely, Raj Kumar Maurya, Intelligence Officer, Ajay Kumar, Speoy and N.P. Singh, Driver, collected the DD kit, weighing machine I.O. kit and other related seizing material and seal of Narcotic Control Bureau DZU-2. The team left the Delhi office and reached at above mentioned address and met Durgesh Prasad, Vigilance Senior Executive of DTDC. After introducing themselves by showing their identify cards, informed about their purpose of coming and requested him and his colleague, one Aas Mohd. Khan, to become independent witnesses for the search and seizure proceedings, to which they accepted. Manoj Kumar, Junior Intelligence Officer, offered these independent witnesses to search him and his team members, to which they declined. Thereafter, the suspected article was opened in the presence of these two independent witnesses. On opening the said parcel, it was found to be jute bag, on which and on the bill, the name of the consignor was written as Gaurav Kumar, Agra (U.P.) and consignee was written as Manoj Kumar, Campa Cola Chowk, Ludhiana-141003.
4. When the said jute bag was opened, a brown card box was found which contained 50,000 tablets of Tramadol weighing 20 kg. Since these were being sent as mis-declared item without bill and were in contravention of the NDPS Act, therefore, seizure proceedings were initiated after due procedure. A notice under Section 67 of NDPS was issued to independent witnesses-Durgesh Prasad and Aas Mohd. Khan. Thereafter, Manoj Kumar, Intelligence Officer, collected relevant information about Gaurav Kumar of Agra and Manoj Kumar of Ludhiana from DTDC office and as mentioned on Airway Bill and prepared disclosure to this effect. The disclosure statement of Manoj Kumar Yadav, Intelligence Officer was placed before Amit Kumar Tiwary, Superintendent, who directed Sh. Sachin Kumar, Intelligence Officer to take action against Gaurav Kumar of Agra and Manoj Kumar of Ludhiana as per law.
5. On the next day, i.e. 10.01.2020, after making relevant entries in the test memo form, the samples seized from the office of DTDC on 09.01.2020 were sent to Chemical Engineer, CRCL Pusa Road, New Delhi through Sh. Yogesh K
Hari Charan Kurmi & Anr. vs. State of Bihar
Kashmira Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Kerala & Ors. vs. Rajesh & Ors.
Surinder Kumar Khanna vs. Intelligence Officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The main legal point established is the inadmissibility of retracted statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act and the need for corroboration of evidence in drug-related cases.
Parameters of bail available under Section 37 of NDPS Act are narrow--Length of period of custody or fact that charge-sheet has been filed and trial has commenced are by themselves not considerations....
The inadmissibility of certain statements made to a police officer and the requirement of foundational material to establish the accused's involvement in the offences.
Bail application—Complicity of petitioner will have to be determined by quality of evidence led during trial.
The judgment emphasizes the principles of innocence until proven guilty, the need for substantive evidence to establish guilt, and the limitations on the admissibility of disclosure statements withou....
A confessional statement made before an officer designated under Section 42 or Section 53 of the NDPS Act cannot be the sole basis for conviction without safeguards. Even in cases involving commercia....
The court confirmed that under Section 37 NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to re-offend.
Point of Law : In the absence of there being any other material available with the prosecution connecting the petitioner with the commission of offence alleged against him, except the statement of th....
The inadmissibility of confessions made to NDPS officers by the accused and the overriding of the statutory embargo created under Section 37 of the NDPS Act by the fundamental right guaranteed under ....
Section 37 is not a complete bar to grant of bail to accused of offence under NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.