Back
W. DIENGDOH
Subrata Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail under ndps act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. events leading to the arrests. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. charges against the accused and their implications. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. arguments for and against bail applications. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's rejection of bail based on evidence. (Para 15 , 18 , 21) |
| 6. legal standards for bail under section 37 of the ndps act. (Para 17 , 19 , 27 , 30) |
| 7. conclusion and final judgment. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
W. Diengdoh, J.
1. An application under Section 439 Cr.P.C has been preferred with a prayer for grant of bail to the accused person Sujit Sarkar, who was arrested and is still in judicial custody in connection with Crl. (NDPS) Case No. 25 of 2023 under Section 20 (b)(ii)(c)/27(A)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2. Similar applications have also been filed on behalf of three other accused persons, namely Karnajit Sarkar, Sanjit Sarkar and Tutan Sarkar respectively, who were also arrested in connection with the said Crl. (NDPS) Case No. 25 of 2023.
3. The grounds raised in the respective applications aforementioned being identical and similar and also the argument advanced on behalf of the said a
The court confirmed that under Section 37 NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to re-offend.
The court emphasized that bail for drug offenses requires proof of innocence and likelihood of non-reoffending, in line with stringent statutory provisions to combat drug trafficking.
(1) Standard prescribed for grant of bail is ‘reasonable ground to believe’ that person is not guilty of offence.(2) Given seriousness of offences punishable under NDPS Act and in order to curb menac....
The court held that bail cannot be granted under the NDPS Act without satisfying the statutory requirements of demonstrating that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is unlikely to commit fu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the impact of delay in trial on the accused's right to liberty, especially in cases governed by stringent bail conditions under special acts like t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the legislative intent to p....
Bail denied under NDPS Section 37 for commercial quantity as petitioner accompanying contraband bearer fled police sans explanation, failing twin conditions of reasonable belief in non-guilt and no r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to satisfy the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act before granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of drugs. The c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
