SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1928

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M.Singh, J.
Rakhi Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 2895 of 2021; C.M. Appls No. 8722 of 2021, 8723 of 2021
Decided On : 05-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Rajat Sang, Advocate, Viney Sharma, Advocate, Saumya Tandon, Advocate

The judgment emphasizes the need for clarity and awareness regarding appealable orders and forums under The Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and Rules to avoid confusion and multiple writ petitions.

Headnote:

Maintenance and Eviction - The Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 2(j), Section 7, Section 15, Rule 22(3)(1), Rule 22(3)(4) - The judgment discusses the provisions related to maintenance and eviction proceedings under the Act and Rules. It clarifies the forum for maintenance proceedings, constitution of Maintenance Tribunal, establishment of Appellate Tribunal, and the procedure for filing appeals. It also explains the process for eviction proceedings, including the application for eviction, verification of property title, and the appellate process.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner, wife of Respondent No.4 and daughter-in-law of Respondent No.3, filed a petition against an eviction order passed by the District Magistrate under The Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The confusion regarding appealable orders and forums under the Act and Rules led to multiple writ petitions being filed directly against the initial orders.

Finding of the Court:

The Court clarified the procedures for maintenance and eviction proceedings, highlighted the appealable orders, and directed the addition of specific sentences in every order to inform litigants and lawyers about the availability of alternate remedies. The petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner for appeal.

Issues: Confusion regarding appealable orders and forums under The Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment clarified the provisions related to maintenance and eviction proceedings, emphasized the need for informing litigants and lawyers about the availability of alternate remedies, and directed the addition of specific sentences in every order to address the confusion.

Final Decision: The petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner for appeal. The Court directed the communication of the judgment to all Maintenance Tribunals, Appellate Tribunals, and concerned Presiding Officers, and the addition of specific sentences in every order to inform about the availability of alternate remedies.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner, who is the wife of Respondent No.4 and daughter-in-law of Respondent No.3, against order dated 8 th February, 2021 passed by the District Magistrate. By the said order, the Petitioner has been evicted from premises bearing no. C-28, Mansa Ram Park, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-59 (hereinafter, 'suit property'). The impugned order has been passed by the District Magistrate while exercising powers under Rule 22 (3)(1) (i) of The Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 (hereinafter, 'Rules'), as amended on 19th December, 2016 vide notification F.No.30(405)/Amendment of Rules-MAWPSC2007/DD(SS)/DSW/2015-16/24836-865.

3. The submission of ld. Counsel for the Petitioner is that the writ petition ought to be entertained by this Court, as an appeal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter, 'Act') can only be filed by a senior citizen. Ms. Tandon, ld. Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the impugned order is appealable to the Divisional Commissioner under Rule 22 (3)(4) of the Rules, as amended on 19th December, 2016. Accordingly, she submits that the Petitioner be allowed to approach the Divisional Commissioner.

4. A large number of writ petitions are filed before this Court challenging orders passed under the Act, as also the Rules. There appears to be some confusion as to which orders are appealable, to which forum and by whom. In order to properly appreciate the scheme of the Act and the Rules thereto, it is necessary to set out the provisions which are applicable separately qua maintenance and eviction proceedings.

    Proceedings relating to Maintenance:

    5. Insofar as maintenance proceedings for the welfare of parents and senior citizens are concerned, under Section 2(j), the Act provides that the 'Tribunal' would be the forum for exercising first jurisdiction. 'Tribunal' is defined under Section 2(j) as the 'Maintenance Tribunal' constituted under Section 7. Section 7 reads as under:

      "Section 7. Constitution of Maintenance Tribunal.

        (1) The State Government shall within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of this Act, by notification in Official Gazette, constitute for each Sub-division one or more Tribunals as may be specified in the notification for the purpose of adjudicating and deciding upon the order for maintenance under section 5.

          (2) The Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of Sub- Divisional Officer of a State.

            (3) Where two or more Tribunals are constituted for any area, the State Government may, by general or special order, regulate the distribution of business among them."

            6. Rule 3(2) further provides for the constitution of the 'Maintenance Tribunal' under Section 7 which reads as under:

              "3. Constitution of Maintenance Tribunal

                ...........

                  (2) The Tribunal shall consist of an ADM or SDM of the subdivision, as the case may be and two other members, of whom one shall be women. "

                    Thus, the Maintenance Tribunal under Section 7 of the Act would be the ADM or the SDM of the concerned sub-division.

                    7. Insofar as filing of appeals qua maintenance related matters are concerned, the same is governed by Section 15 of the Act, under which the State has to constitute an Appellate Tribunal. Section 15 of the Act reads as under:

                      "15. Constitution of Appellate Tribunal

                        (1)The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one Appellate Tribunal for each district to hear the appeal against the order of the Tribunal.

                          (2)The Appellate Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of District Magistrate."

                          8. Rule 16 of the Rules deals with the establishment and procedure of the Appellate Tribunal, under which, the District Magistrate of each District has been notified as the Appellate Tribunal. Rule 16 reads as under

                                                                                                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                          2
                                                                                                          3
                                                                                                          4
                                                                                                          5
                                                                                                          6
                                                                                                          7
                                                                                                          8
                                                                                                          9
                                                                                                          10
                                                                                                          11
                                                                                                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                                                          supreme today icon
                                                                                                          logo-black

                                                                                                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                                                          Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                                                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                                                          qr

                                                                                                          Scan Me!

                                                                                                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                                                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                                                          whatsapp-icon Back to top