IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Manoj Gupta - Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Appln No. 121 of 2021
Decided On : 26-02-2021
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Sections 9A, 25A, 22, 23, 29 - The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the controlled commodity nature of Pseudoephedrine and lack of criminal antecedents. The court emphasized the need for the petitioner to comply with specific conditions upon release.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for offences under Sections 9A, 25A, 22, 23, and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution's case involved the seizure of Pseudoephedrine from a parcel and statements from involved individuals.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the controlled nature of Pseudoephedrine and the lack of criminal antecedents for the petitioner. It refrained from delving into the merits of the case to avoid prejudice and granted bail based on specific conditions.
Issues: The issues revolved around the admissibility of evidence, the quantity of seized Pseudoephedrine, and the likelihood of the petitioner tampering with evidence if released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the controlled commodity nature of Pseudoephedrine, the absence of criminal antecedents for the petitioner, and the need to prevent prejudice by refraining from delving into the case's merits.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner with specific conditions, including the furnishing of a personal bond, surrendering the passport, maintaining a functional mobile number, and reporting to the Investigating Officer every Monday.
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. - This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C seeking regular bail in C.C.No. VII/36/DZU/2020 dated 27.11.2020, registered at Police Station R.K Puram, Delhi for offences under Sections 9A, 25A, 22, 23 and 29 of NDPS Act. The petitioner was arrested on 27.09.2020.
2. The case of the prosecution as given in the Status Report is as under:
"Based upon information received on 14-08-2020, a parcel bearing AWB No. 6098216305 lying at Sky Line Logistics, 71/3, Rama Road, Najafgarh Industrial Area, Delhi, which had been booked by one Lilesh Sen, Bhilwara, Rajasthan and destined to Deborah Wood, Adelaide, Australia, was examined. The said parcel was found to contain ladies clothes and 2 khaki colour cardboard and 24 plastic type envelopes. The 2 khaki cardboard contained 04 plastic packets, thereafter total 28 plastic packets were checked and were found to contain white powdery substance i.e. gave positive result for Pseudoephedrine. The total weight of substance was 3 Kgs.800 grams.
During investigation, it revealed by Mr. Vinod Singh (owner of TRACON Courier) in his statement u/sec. (37, NDPS Act that the said parcel was initially booked on 12-08-2020 and gave details of whatsapp chat & mobile numbers of the person who booked, as well as stated that same person had booked two more parcels earlier in July & August, 2020. Since parcels were booked on ID of one Lilesh Sen, during investigation, Lilesh Sen was summoned and he revealed in his statement u/sec. 67 on 3-9-2020 that he had travelled to Udaipur on 13-07-2020 and had stayed at Ashirwad Hotel. During his stay at said Hotel, the person at Reception had taken his ID & PAN Card and had gone out of hotel on pretext of photocopy of IDs. Thereafter, on 27-09-2020, notice under section 67 NDPS was served upon Manoj Gupta at his Ashirvad Hotel and he tendered his voluntary statement on 28-9-2020, wherein he admitted that the said parcel was booked by him using the ID documents of Lilesh Sen. He also aomitted that he had booked said parcel on instructions of one person Rafiq of Chennai. Further revealed that he had sent more parcels using the ID of Lilesh Sen. He further revealed the manner in which he had obtained documents from Lilesh Sen and the way he had used them for booking of said parcel containing contraband at Tracon Courier. Other documents i.e. visitor register, 16 Aadhar Cards (original), 6 driving license (original) and 2 voters card (original) in name of several persons were also produced by Manoj Gupta during his statement. In further statement of Lilesh Sen dated 28-9-2020, he had identified Manoj Gupta as the person who was present at Hotel Ashirvad and had taken his ID documents. Even owner of Tracon Courier in his statement dated 28-9-2020 also identified accused Manoj Gupta as the person who had come to book the said parcel "(AWB 6098216305)."
3. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that Pseudoephedrine is only a controlled commodity and therefore the rigor of Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply to the facts of this case. He contends that the only evidence against the petitioner are the statements given by Lilesh Sen and Vinod Singh which are not admissible in view of the judgement of Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2013) 16 SCC 31. He would state that other than the two disclosure statements the only other document is the voluntary statement of the petitioner under section 67 of the NDPS Act. He would state that the charge-sheet has been filed. He would contend that there are no antecedents against the petitioner. It is submitted that there is no likelihood of the trial concluding in the near future and the petitioner be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, Mr. Subhash Bansal, Sr. Standing Counsel appearing for the NCB states that the petitioner has sent parcels on earlier occasions also. He would contend that 3.8 Kg. of Pseudoephedrine has been seized which is a huge quantity. It is contended t
The central legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the controlled commodity nature of Pseudoephedrine and the absence of criminal antecedents in granting bail.
The court determined that the rigor of Section 37 of the NDPS Act does not apply to cases involving controlled commodities like Pseudoephedrine, allowing for bail under certain conditions.
The prohibition of activities related to controlled substances without proper registration and the potential consequences of large quantities of controlled substances being illegally exported were ce....
The bar under Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply to cases involving controlled substances, allowing for bail if the accused demonstrates entitlement, especially for foreign nationals.
NDPS Act – Controlled substance – Grant of Bail - in cases, where the controlled substance recovered was even much larger then that recovered from the petitioner/accused even in those cases the bail ....
The seriousness of the allegations, the quantity of the substance recovered, and the foreign status of the petitioner are crucial factors in determining bail eligibility under the NDPS Act.
The court established that Section 37 of the NDPS Act does not apply to controlled substances, allowing for bail considerations based on personal circumstances rather than nationality.
Foreign nationals can be eligible for bail in NDPS cases based on specific circumstances, and the classification of substances under the NDPS Act is crucial in determining bail eligibility.
The stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act and the need for substantial probable causes to grant bail.
Point of Law : Before the Court grants bail to an accused allegedly involved in an offence under the NDPS Act, the Court required to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty of the offence and tha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.