SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1805

SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajat Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Izhar Ahmed, Advocate, Raj Kumar, Advocate, R.S. Goswami, Advocate, Varun Mittal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - In the above captioned first petition [Crl.M.C. 591/2021], quashing of FIR No. 270/2019, under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, registered at police station North Rohini, Delhi is sought. In the above captioned second petition [Crl.M.C. 613/2021], quashing of FIR No. 122/2019, under Sections 323/354B/341/506/509/34 IPC, registered at police station Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, is sought.

2. Petitioner No.1 in the first captioned petition [Crl.M.C. 591/2021] is the husband, petitioner No.2 & 3 are the parents in laws and petitioner No.4 is the brother-in-law of respondent No.2/wife, who is the complainant of FIR No. 270/2019. The basis of this FIR is matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No2/wife.

3. The matrimonial dispute resulted in registration of cross FIR bearing No. 122/2019 at police station Rajouri Garden, at the instance of mother of husband against the parents and family members of wife. In the above captioned second petition [Crl.M.C. 613/2021] quashing of the said FIR is sought by the parents and family members of wife.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top