SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajat Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of opposing firs due to matrimonial disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. proceedings conducted via video conferencing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. recognition of amicable settlement and divorce decree. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. court's decision to quash firs based on resolution of dispute. (Para 11 , 12)
5. disposition of petitions and pending applications. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. In the above captioned first petition [Crl.M.C. 591/2021], quashing of FIR No. 270/2019, under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, registered at police station North Rohini, Delhi is sought. In the above captioned second petition [Crl.M.C. 613/2021], quashing of FIR No. 122/2019, under Sections 323/354B/341/506/509/34 IPC, registered at police station Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, is sought.

2. Petitioner No.1 in the first captioned petition [Crl.M.C. 591/2021] is the husband, petitioner No.2 & 3 are the parents in laws and petitioner No.4 is the brother-in-law of respondent No.2/wife, who is the complainant of FIR No. 270/2019. The basis of this FIR is matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No2/wife.

3. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top