SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1694

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, JJ.
Neeraj Sehrawat & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Govt Of NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
W.P. (Crl) (Writ Petition (Criminal)) No. 280 of 2021
Decided On : 10-02-2021

Important Points

The court's decision was based on the current and potential visitation arrangements for inmates, as presented by the government counsel.

Subject

Criminal Law - Prison Visitation Rights

Act Referred

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : Art.226

Headnote

Exemption - Writ Petition - The court disposed of the exemption application subject to all just exceptions.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition sought to allow the petitioners to meet a specific individual in jail twice every week.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Delhi Police were permitting physical and virtual meetings with advocates and relatives for the inmates, with the possibility of reverting to pre-pandemic visitation rules in the future. As a result, the petitioners did not press the petition further, and it was disposed of accordingly.

Issues: The issue was whether the petitioners should be granted the specific visitation rights they sought through the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the information provided by the government counsel regarding the current and potential visitation arrangements for inmates.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of accordingly, as the petitioners did not press the matter further.

Advocates appeared:
Rudro Chatterjee, Advocate, Shariq Nisar, Advocate, Sanawar, Advocate, Jatin Bhatt, Advocate, Rahul Mehra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. - CRL.M.A.2115/2021 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P. (CRL.) 280/2021

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India instituted on behalf of the petitioners prays as follows: -

"a) Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ, thereby allowing the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 to meet Petitioner No.1 in jail twice every week, in accordance with the Rules governing the name;

b) pass any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice."

2. Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) appearing on behalf of Government of NCT of Delhi on advance notice, on instructions from Mr. Prashant Verma, Officer-in-Charge (Legal) Delhi Prisons, Tihar Headquarters states that w.e.f. 05.02.2021 and 08.02.202, the Delhi Police are permitting 01 physical legal interview with an Advocate and 01 physical mulaakaat with a relative, respectively, to all the inmates every week. In addition, it is stated that 01 virtual legal interview with an Advocate and 01 virtual mulaakaat with a relative is also being permitted to every inmate, subject to certain guidelines. Mr. Mehra lastly states that prison authorities are hopeful of reverting back to the position vis- -vis mulaakaats that existed prior to the onset of Covid-19 pandemic i.e. 02 physical mulaakaats and 02 physical interviews to all inmates every week from 01.04.2021, subject to the pandemic remaining under control.

3. In view of the foregoing, Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners does not press this petition any further.

4. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top