IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Natasha Narwal & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 2087 of 2021
Decided On : 09-02-2023
Prison Rules - Writ Petition - [Prison Rules] - [Prison Rules, 2018] - The court considered the reliefs sought in the writ petition related to prison rules, physical and virtual mulaqaats, access to medical professionals, adherence to natural justice, and other facilities for inmates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Detailed directions were issued to address the issues raised, including physical mulaqats, computer center, and legal aid. The court also addressed additional issues such as tele-calling facilities, vaccination of inmates, and monthly calling charges.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition was filed by two undertrial persons seeking reliefs related to prison rules, access to facilities, and communication with family and friends during the COVID-19 pandemic. Detailed directions were issued to address the issues raised, including physical mulaqats, computer center, and legal aid. Additional issues such as tele-calling facilities, vaccination of inmates, and monthly calling charges were also considered by the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reliefs sought by the petitioners were valid and issued detailed directions to address the issues raised, ensuring access to facilities and communication for inmates during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Issues: The issues raised in the case included physical and virtual mulaqaats, access to medical professionals, adherence to natural justice, tele-calling facilities, vaccination of inmates, and monthly calling charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to address the challenges faced by inmates during the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring access to facilities, communication, and medical assistance while considering the limitations imposed by the pandemic.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and detailed directions were issued to address the issues raised. The court also allowed the petitioners to approach in case of any change of circumstances.
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The instant writ petition was filed by the Petitioners- Ms. Natasha Narwal and Ms. Devangana Kalita, two undertrial persons, who were lodged in Tihar Jail at the time when the writ petition was filed. The petition was filed during the COVID-19 pandemic. They had sought several reliefs in this writ petition in view of the suspension of certain prison rules, change in prison rules owing to the pandemic and the requirement for isolation which was prescribed during the said period.
3. The reliefs sought in the writ petition are as under:
"(i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 in consultation with the Respondent Director General of Prisons to amend/formulate rules in terms of the table set out hereinabove;
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to allow Petitioners as also other inmates of jails within the NCT of Delhi to have the choice to have physical or virtual mulaqaats to communicate with family and friends regularly as is mandated by the Prison Rules, 2018;
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to permit the Petitioners and other inmates of jails within the NCT of Delhi access to accredited doctors, therapists, and other medical professionals through video-conferencing facilities;
(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 in consultation with the Respondent Director General of Prisons to amend/formulate rules to permit adherence to norms of natural justice and prisoner participation in disciplinary proceedings;
(v) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to make mandatory/compulsory the viewing of a video introducing new inmates to prison life;
(vi) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to permit the Petitioner access to resource persons/research supervisors/other professionals through video-conferencing facilities as required for the purpose of completing education;
(vii) Issue a writ of mandamus setting aside Rule 1268(k) as violative of the right to food and to suitably amend the same to permit access to eggs/non-vegetarian food; and to
(viii) Pass such other Order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. Notice was issued on 17th February, 2021 in this case and a report was sought from the Respondent No. 1- GNCTD. On the said date, a direction was issued to the Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail to arrange for video conferencing facilities to the Petitioners in order to enable them to join the Court proceedings through video conferencing. Thereafter, on 13thApril, 2021, the GNCTD had filed its status report pursuant to which detailed directions were issued in respect of provisions for the following:
(i) Physical mulaqaats,
(ii) Computer centers,
(iii) Legal aid for the Petitioners.
5. The relevant extract of the said order dated 13th April, 2021 reads as:
"3. On 17th February, 2021, the issues raised by the Petitioners in respect of Physical mulaqats, VC facilities etc. were recorded in the order passed on the said date and a status report was called-for from the Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
4. The said status report has been placed on record, along with various annexures. The counsels for the Petitioner and the Respondents have made their respective submissions. The Petitioners have also joined the hearing through video-conferencing from Jail. At this stage, the three issues that the Petitioners highlight are as under:
(i) Physical mulaqats: In respect of physical mulaqats, the status report indicates that at least 8 physical mulaqats for 30 minutes per month were being permitted prior to the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic for each under trial prisoner. Post the outbreak of the pandemic, physical mulaqats have been stopped and e-mulaqats are currently prevalent. Currently 3 e-mulaqats of 15 minutes per month are permitted. For a brief period, physical mulaqats were re-started but again
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the authorities to provide necessary facilities for prisoners, including regular communication with their families, expedited ....
Inmates' rights to health and communication during COVID-19 pandemic must be upheld, prioritizing access to tele-calling and vaccination per Article 21.
The court balanced the rights of under-trial prisoners with public health concerns, ensuring access to necessary facilities in jail during the pandemic.
Court ordered enhanced tele-calling, vaccination, and e-mulaqaats for inmates, ensuring communication and health safety amidst pandemic challenges.
The court emphasized the necessity for adequate facilities for under-trial prisoners to ensure their right to family contact and access to justice, particularly during the pandemic.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to relax the criteria for granting parole and temporary bail to reduce the prison population and prevent the spread of COVID-19 among pris....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to relax the criteria for parole and temporary bail to effectively reduce overcrowding in prisons and protect prisoners from the COVID-19 ....
The court's decision was based on the current and potential visitation arrangements for inmates, as presented by the government counsel.
The court emphasized the importance of restoring inmate visitation rights while accommodating public health guidelines due to the pandemic.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.