IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Rekha Palli, JJ.
Corporate Infotech Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4515 of 2020; Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 16253 of 2020
Decided On : 22-01-2021
E-tender Cancellation - Information Technology Services - Indian Contract Act, 1872, Article 14 of the Constitution of India - Cancellation of tender process, legitimate expectation, public authority's actions, Request for Proposal, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Article 14 of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an IT services company, challenged the cancellation of an E-tender for providing internet bandwidth, AMC & Maintenance of IT Infrastructure, Network Management for the three Municipal Corporations of Delhi. The petitioner participated in the tender process and was declared qualified, but the tender was cancelled without reason. The respondents justified the cancellation based on high quotations from all bidders, including the petitioner, and reserved rights in the tender document to reject bids without assigning reasons.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Request for Proposal is only an invitation to offer, and the entity inviting offers is not bound to accept any offer. However, the public authority's actions are subject to Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and must be bona fide and for good reason. The Court examined the reasons for cancellation and found them to be based on high quotations from the petitioner and other bidders, justifying the decision to cancel the tender process.
Issues: The issues involved the legitimacy of the cancellation of the E-tender, the public authority's actions in the tender process, and the petitioner's legitimate expectation of being awarded the contract as the L1 Bidder.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the cancellation of the E-tender was justified based on high quotations from all bidders, including the petitioner, and the reserved rights in the tender document to reject bids without assigning reasons. The public authority's actions are subject to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and must be bona fide and for good reason.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petition, leaving the parties to bear their respective costs.
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. - This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner primarily to assail the decision of the respondent, namely South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to cancel the E-tender Notice No. DIT/SDMC/2020/15/D-09 dated 30.04.2020, which was a Request of Proposal (RFP) for selection of vender for providing internet bandwidth, AMC & Maintenance of IT Infrastructure, Network Management for the three Municipal Corporations of Delhi, communicated to the petitioner vide order dated 16.07.2020. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the Administrative Officer of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to complete the process of tender in pursuance of E-tender notice dated 30.04.2020 from the stage as was on 03.06.2020.
2. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of providing Information Technology Services. The petitioner has disclosed that in the year 2009, the then Municipal Corporation of Delhi had awarded a contract to M/S Tech Mahindra Ltd. for providing services of the kind in respect whereof the aforesaid RFP was issued on 30.04.2020. In January 2012, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi was trifurcated into three Municipal Corporations, namely the South, North and East Delhi Municipal Corporations. The petitioner further states that as per its information, M/s Tech Mahindra sub-delegated the work to Leading Edge Communication Pvt. Limited which is presently providing the relevant services. The petitioner further states that the contract with M/s Tech Mahindra came to an end on 31.12.2019, yet the respondent is continuing to avail services from Leading Edge Communication Pvt. Limited. On 06.12.2019, the South Delhi Municipal Corporation floated a tender vide E-tender notification No. DIT/SDMC/2019-20/14/D-899 for selection of a vendor for providing Internet Bandwidth, AMC & maintenance of IT Infrastructure, Network Management for South, North and East Municipal Corporations of Delhi, calling upon the prospective bidders to submit tenders upto 26.12.2020.
3. The petitioner states that it participated in the said process. However, on 15.04.2020, the Tender Evaluation Committee recommended the scrapping of the ongoing tender process, and to invite fresh tenders. This recommendation of the Tender Evaluation Committee was accepted by the Commissioner, SDMC, and consequently that tender was cancelled. On 30.04.2020, fresh online tenders were invited for the second time vide a tender notice No. DIT/SDMC/2020/15/D-09, by the IT Department, South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) for selection of vendor for providing Internet Bandwidth, AMC & Maintenance of IT Infrastructure, Network Management for South, North and East Delhi Municipal Corporations. On 06.05.2020, a pre-bid meeting was organised, where 9 prospective bidders participated. The petitioner states that it submitted its bid on 19.05.2020. The last date for submitting the bid was up to 03:00 PM on 20.05.2020.
4. In all, seven vendors made their offers. On 20.05.2020, the Techno Commercial Bids of all the bidders were opened on the E-Tendering Portal of SDMC. Five of the seven bidders qualified, including the petitioner. They were eligible and qualified for further evaluation. On 03.06.2020, the SDMCafter evaluating the Techno Commercial Bids, declared 3 bidders as qualified which included the petitioner, apart from Bharti Airtel Ltd., and Square System Technologies Ltd. The petitioner states that its financial bid was the lowest. Consequently, the petitioner had a legitimate expectation that its bid would be approved and it would be issued a Letter of Acceptance. However, suddenly, on 16.07.2020, the SDMC issued the impugned orders/ communication - cancelling the tender Notice dated 30.04.2020. The impugned communication did not give any reason for
AI
Public authorities can cancel tenders without assigning reasons, provided the decision is made bona fide to safeguard public funds, and being the lowest bidder does not guarantee contract award.
The cancellation of a tender by a public authority is valid if it is based on informed considerations regarding competitive pricing, allowing the authority to reject bids without justification.
In order to notice such variation in the conditions of RFP, qualifying criteria etc the person concerned need not required to be a technical one. Suffice it to hold from the point of view of this cou....
A successful bidder in a tender process does not have a vested right to the contract, and the tendering authority can cancel bids based on commercial prudence.
A public authority's decision to cancel a tender must be reasoned and not arbitrary; failure to provide justifications exposes such decisions to judicial scrutiny.
The authority's interpretation of tender conditions is paramount, and non-compliance with explicit requirements justifies cancellation of bids.
The authority may cancel a tender without reason if lack of competition is evident; bidders have no enforceable rights without formal acceptance of their bids.
The procuring entity has the discretion to cancel tenders and re-invite bids without prior communication of reasons; judicial review is limited to assessing arbitrariness or statutory violations in p....
Lowest bidder has no vested right to contract; authority may cancel tender for valid reasons like cartel without malice; tender conditions not judicially reviewable unless arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.