PKF Sridhar and Santhanam vs Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
PKF Sridhar and Santhanam – Appellant
Versus
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. cancellation of the tender process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's claims regarding the tendering process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. authority's right to cancel tender based on reasonability. (Para 10 , 13 , 14)
4. validity of the decision not to accept the l-1 bid. (Para 16 , 20 , 21)
5. court's dismissal of the petition. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)--The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition being aggrieved by the cancellation of the tender in question vide the Public Notice No. 29/2021-22 dated 29.09.2021.

2. By the said Public Notice, the tender for Assignment-I of RFP No. 01/2021-22 issued by the respondent-Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, was cancelled.

3. Vide the RFP No. 01/2021-22 dated 24.06.2021, the respondent had invited proposals for "empanelment of consultants to assist the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India (i.e. the respondent) in determination of tariffs for aeronautical services at various major airports for the control period 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2026."

4. The bids were invited under two assignments. We are concerned with Assignment No. 1, which relates to tendering of consu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGHPKF Sridhar and Santhanam – AppellantVersusAirports Economic Regulatory Authority of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
PKF Sridhar and Santhanam – Appellant
Versus
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India – Respondent