Back
SACHIN DATTA
Urmila – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sachin Datta, J. -
CM Appl. 29999/2022 (vacation of stay) in W.P.(C) 9625/2022 CM Appl. 30013/2022 (vacation of stay) in W.P. (C) 9628/2022
1. These applications have been filed by respondent No. 1/Delhi Development Authority ('DDA'), seeking vacation of the order dated 28.06.2022 in the instant petitions, whereby status quo was directed to be maintained. The said order dated 28.06.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 9625/2022, reads as under:-
'CM NO. 28721/2022
1. A Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed for appropriate directions to protect the petitioners against the arbitrary and illegal demolition or eviction from Gyaspur Basti, Sarai Kale Khan, Nizamuddin East, South East Delhi, New Delhi.
2. It is submitted in the petition that the petitioners are the residents of two Gyaspur Basti clusters which are located on either side of the road in Sarai Kale Khan, Nizamuddin East, South East Delhi, New Delhi. The two clusters house 100 families and a total of over 459 residents are residing there. Settlement A on one side of the road is 100 meters away from Settlement B adjacent to the Kalindi Gaushala. It is asserted that on 18thJune, 2022 about
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner and other residents of the jhuggis were not entitled to rehabilitation as per the DUSIB policy, 2015, and the DUSIB Act, 2010. ....
The judgment established that for entitlement to protection/rehabilitation under the existing policy framework for rehabilitation of residents of Jhuggi-Jhopri in Delhi, the settlement must qualify a....
Eligibility for rehabilitation under the 2015 Policy is contingent upon the notification of jhuggi jhopri basti by DUSIB and adherence to the cut-off dates for entitlement to rehabilitation.
Failure to substantiate entitlement to rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 results in denial of the benefit. However, authorities must provide temporar....
The judgment established that under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, residents must prove that their clusters were notified by DUSIB and that the jhuggis were constru....
Eligibility for rehabilitation or relocation under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 is contingent upon the existence of jhuggi jhopri basti clusters before specific da....
The court affirmed that entitlement to relocation benefits under the policy should validly consider prior residency of slum dwellers, even if the current jhuggi was established post cut-off date.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a person cannot repeatedly approach a Writ Court claiming the same relief by making changes in the prayer clause, as it would amount to an abu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
