IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Rohtash & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Public Works Department & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 13498 of 2023 and CM APPL. 53293 of 2023
Decided On : 20-11-2023
Eviction Notice - Rehabilitation Policy - Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010 - [Section 2(g) of DUSIB Act, 2010, Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation & Relocation Policy, 2015]
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioners sought to challenge an Eviction Notice and sought rehabilitation as per the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 read with Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. The Petitioners claimed entitlement to rehabilitation based on their proximity to a cluster identified by DUSIB.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Petitioners failed to substantiate their claim for rehabilitation and did not approach the appropriate authorities to establish their entitlement. The Court held that the Petitioners were not entitled to the benefit of rehabilitation policy but directed the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.
Issues: Entitlement to Rehabilitation under Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015
Ratio Decidendi: The Petitioners failed to substantiate their claim for rehabilitation and did not approach the appropriate authorities to establish their entitlement. The Court held that the Petitioners were not entitled to the benefit of rehabilitation policy but directed the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.
Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of, with the direction for the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. - The Petitioners seek to challenge the Eviction Notice dated 20.09.2023 issued by the Respondent No.1/Public Works Department directing the Petitioners to vacate their Jhuggis which have been put up at Opposite Transport Authority, Gokulpuri Village, North East Delhi-110094. The Petitioners also seek for a direction to restrain the proposed demolition of the Jhuggis of the Petitioners and also rehabilitation of the Petitioners as per the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 read with Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as DUSIB Act, 2010)
2. It is stated that the Petitioners, who belong to Gadia Lohar community, migrated from Rajasthan to Delhi and started residing in Delhi at Opposite Transport Authority, Gokulpuri Village, North East Delhi-110094. It is pertinent to mention here that though the Petitioners in the list of dates and in the facts as narrated in the writ petition have made such an averment but nothing has been filed before this Court to substantiate their contention.
3. It is the contention of the Petitioners that they are entitled to the benefit of Rehabilitation Policy brought out by the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and also the benefit of the Judgment passed by this Court in the case of Ajay Maken & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., (2019) SCC OnLine Del 7618. It is stated that this Court in Ajay Maken (supra) has laid down the steps to conduct a survey of the Jhuggis and JJ Bastis before removal of the same which the Petitioner has quoted in the writ petition and the same are being reproduced as under:
"6. Steps to be followed prior to removal of Jhuggis and JJ Bastis
A.Pre-Survey Steps:
i. The process of removal/re-settlement/ rehabilitation/ in-situ improvement/redevelopment of Jhuggis and JJ Bastis in Delhi will be governed by "Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation & Relocation Policy, 2015"
ii. The Land Owing Agency (LOA) will send a proposal for removal of the jhuggis and JJ bastis to DUSIB with proper justification satisfying the conditions mentioned in the policy sufficiently in advance, along with commitment to make payment of the cost of rehabilitation.
iii. The proposal will be examined by DUSIB regarding the date of existence of JJ basti i.e. whether the same was in existence prior to 01.01.2006. If the JJ basti was in existence prior to 01.01.2006, then the DUSIB will notify the said Basti under section 2(g) of the DUSIB Act, if not notified earlier and the proposal will be placed before the Board (DUSIB) for in-principle approval for removal of the Jhuggis and JJ basti.
iv. After in principle approval of the Board, the DUSIB will conduct a joint survey and determine the eligibility of JJ dwellers for rehabilitation as per the policy along with the representative(s) of LOA. However, in special circumstances, the joint survey may be initiated even before obtaining in-principle approval of the Board, on case to case basis, with the approval of CEO, DUSIB. If the DUSIB ascertains that the JJ Basti came into existence after 01- 01-2006, the LOA will be intimated accordingly to enable it to take necessary action for removal, in consonance with the law and rules in vogue."
4. The Petitioners, therefore, contend that before conducting any demolition drive, the land owning agency has to sent a proposal to DUSIB and the DUSIB will first examine as to whether the Jhuggi Jhopri dwellers residing in the area are eligible for rehabilitation as per the policy and only after when it is ascertained that the Jhuggi Jhopri dwellers are not entitled to rehabilitation, a demolition drive can take place. The principle argument of the Petitioner is that Block-C, Sanjay Camp, Gokulpuri-I forms part of the 675 clusters identified by the DUSIB which are entitled to rehabilitation. It is stated that the Jhuggi Jhopris of the Petitioners are only 500 meters away from Sanjay Camp, Gokulpuri-I which finds mention at serial No.622 of 67
Failure to substantiate entitlement to rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 results in denial of the benefit. However, authorities must provide temporar....
The judgment established that for entitlement to protection/rehabilitation under the existing policy framework for rehabilitation of residents of Jhuggi-Jhopri in Delhi, the settlement must qualify a....
Eligibility for rehabilitation under the 2015 Policy is contingent upon the notification of jhuggi jhopri basti by DUSIB and adherence to the cut-off dates for entitlement to rehabilitation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner and other residents of the jhuggis were not entitled to rehabilitation as per the DUSIB policy, 2015, and the DUSIB Act, 2010. ....
The main legal point established is that unless a jhuggi is part of the recognized cluster of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, no rehabilitation can be directed.
Eligibility for rehabilitation or relocation under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 is contingent upon the existence of jhuggi jhopri basti clusters before specific da....
The court affirmed that entitlement to relocation benefits under the policy should validly consider prior residency of slum dwellers, even if the current jhuggi was established post cut-off date.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.