SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Rohtash & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Public Works Department & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 13498 of 2023 and CM APPL. 53293 of 2023
Decided On : 20-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Anupradha Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Sheenu Priya, Advocate for GNCTD, Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate and Ms. Aakriti Garg, Advocate for DUSIB, for the Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
Failure to substantiate entitlement to rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 results in denial of the benefit. However, authorities must provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the affected individuals.

Headnote:

Eviction Notice - Rehabilitation Policy - Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010 - [Section 2(g) of DUSIB Act, 2010, Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation & Relocation Policy, 2015]

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioners sought to challenge an Eviction Notice and sought rehabilitation as per the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 read with Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. The Petitioners claimed entitlement to rehabilitation based on their proximity to a cluster identified by DUSIB.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the Petitioners failed to substantiate their claim for rehabilitation and did not approach the appropriate authorities to establish their entitlement. The Court held that the Petitioners were not entitled to the benefit of rehabilitation policy but directed the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.

Issues: Entitlement to Rehabilitation under Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015

Ratio Decidendi: The Petitioners failed to substantiate their claim for rehabilitation and did not approach the appropriate authorities to establish their entitlement. The Court held that the Petitioners were not entitled to the benefit of rehabilitation policy but directed the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of, with the direction for the authorities to provide temporary alternate shelters and relocate the Petitioners.

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. - The Petitioners seek to challenge the Eviction Notice dated 20.09.2023 issued by the Respondent No.1/Public Works Department directing the Petitioners to vacate their Jhuggis which have been put up at Opposite Transport Authority, Gokulpuri Village, North East Delhi-110094. The Petitioners also seek for a direction to restrain the proposed demolition of the Jhuggis of the Petitioners and also rehabilitation of the Petitioners as per the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 read with Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as DUSIB Act, 2010)

2. It is stated that the Petitioners, who belong to Gadia Lohar community, migrated from Rajasthan to Delhi and started residing in Delhi at Opposite Transport Authority, Gokulpuri Village, North East Delhi-110094. It is pertinent to mention here that though the Petitioners in the list of dates and in the facts as narrated in the writ petition have made such an averment but nothing has been filed before this Court to substantiate their contention.

3. It is the contention of the Petitioners that they are entitled to the benefit of Rehabilitation Policy brought out by the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and also the benefit of the Judgment passed by this Court in the case of Ajay Maken & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., (2019) SCC OnLine Del 7618. It is stated that this Court in Ajay Maken (supra) has laid down the steps to conduct a survey of the Jhuggis and JJ Bastis before removal of the same which the Petitioner has quoted in the writ petition and the same are being reproduced as under:

    "6. Steps to be followed prior to removal of Jhuggis and JJ Bastis

    A.Pre-Survey Steps:

    i. The process of removal/re-settlement/ rehabilitation/ in-situ improvement/redevelopment of Jhuggis and JJ Bastis in Delhi will be governed by "Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation & Relocation Policy, 2015"

    ii. The Land Owing Agency (LOA) will send a proposal for removal of the jhuggis and JJ bastis to DUSIB with proper justification satisfying the conditions mentioned in the policy sufficiently in advance, along with commitment to make payment of the cost of rehabilitation.

    iii. The proposal will be examined by DUSIB regarding the date of existence of JJ basti i.e. whether the same was in existence prior to 01.01.2006. If the JJ basti was in existence prior to 01.01.2006, then the DUSIB will notify the said Basti under section 2(g) of the DUSIB Act, if not notified earlier and the proposal will be placed before the Board (DUSIB) for in-principle approval for removal of the Jhuggis and JJ basti.

    iv. After in principle approval of the Board, the DUSIB will conduct a joint survey and determine the eligibility of JJ dwellers for rehabilitation as per the policy along with the representative(s) of LOA. However, in special circumstances, the joint survey may be initiated even before obtaining in-principle approval of the Board, on case to case basis, with the approval of CEO, DUSIB. If the DUSIB ascertains that the JJ Basti came into existence after 01- 01-2006, the LOA will be intimated accordingly to enable it to take necessary action for removal, in consonance with the law and rules in vogue."

    4. The Petitioners, therefore, contend that before conducting any demolition drive, the land owning agency has to sent a proposal to DUSIB and the DUSIB will first examine as to whether the Jhuggi Jhopri dwellers residing in the area are eligible for rehabilitation as per the policy and only after when it is ascertained that the Jhuggi Jhopri dwellers are not entitled to rehabilitation, a demolition drive can take place. The principle argument of the Petitioner is that Block-C, Sanjay Camp, Gokulpuri-I forms part of the 675 clusters identified by the DUSIB which are entitled to rehabilitation. It is stated that the Jhuggi Jhopris of the Petitioners are only 500 meters away from Sanjay Camp, Gokulpuri-I which finds mention at serial No.622 of 67

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top