ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Anil – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. -
Crl.M. (Bail) 8236/2020
1. An application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellant.
2. The appellant stands convicted vide judgment dated 25.04.2019 for the offences under Sections 498A/304B I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Vide order dated 30.04.2019, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 02 years with fine of Rs. 10,000/- (in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 06 months) for offence under Section 498A I.P.C., to undergo RI for a period of 10 years for offence under Section 304B I.P.C. and to undergo SI for a period of 01 year with fine of Rs. 5,000/- (in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 03 months) for offence under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. All the sentences to run concurrently.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is strong case on merits, since the writing in the suicide note was never compared during the course of investigation. Also, during the course of trial, benefit of bail was extended to the petitioner vide order dated 08.04.2015 passed by t
Amar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Babu Singh and Ors. vs. State of U.P. (1978) 1 SCC 579
Biswajit Halder @ Babu Halder & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal
Chaman Lal vs. State of U.P. and Anr. (2004) 7 SCC 525
Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. and Anr. (2018) 3 SCC 22
Devinder @ Kala Ram and Ors. vs. State of Haryana
Hira Lal & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
Major Singh and Anr. vs. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.