Dhruv Jyoti Goel vs State - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1570

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 1570

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Dhruv Jyoti Goel – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Kiran Suri, Advocate, Dhruva Bhagat, Advocate, Kunal gosain, Advocate, Mohit Gulati, Advocate, Amit Ahlawat, Advocate, Jatan Singh, Advocate, Chrag Mudgal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. - This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 883/2020 under Sections 420 IPC registered at Police Station Najafgarh.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the present FIR was registered on the complaint of Pradeep Kumar (complainant) against the Dhruv Goel (present petitioner) who represented himself to be the rightful owner of property bearing khasra No. 113min (0-4), 112 min (1-0), 118min (1-0), 121 min (1-0) and 122 mm (1-0) of village Maksudabad, Najafgarh, New Delhi. The petitioner showed a khatoni where applicant Dhruv Goel is reflected as the owner of the property. Thereafter an agreement to sell between the complainant and Dhruv Goel was executed on 15.12.2015, for total sale consideration of Rs.6,90,00,000/-, as per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the complainant was induced to pay Rs.15,00,000/- vide cheque bearing No. 000013 dated 29.11.2015 which was encashed by the accused person and remaining Rs.85,00,000/- were paid in cash. also, the petitioner, had to obtain No Objection Certificate, from concerned department for sale of the property mentioned abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document