Back
JYOTI SINGH
Hindustan Unilever Limited And Another – Appellant
Versus
Unileverr1. in – Respondent
ORDER
I.A. 6540/2022 (Exemption)
1. Subject to the Plaintiffs filing originals, clearer copies and documents with proper margins, which it may seek to place reliance on, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted.
2. Application is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 6539/2022 (Additional Documents)
3. Present application has been preferred on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking leave to file additional documents under Order 11 Rule 1(4) CPC.
4. Plaintiffs, if it wishes to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
5. Application is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 6538/2022 (Exemption from issuing notice to Defendants No. 18 and 19)
6. Since there is an urgency in the matter and the matter is being heard today, Plaintiffs are exempted from serving the Defendants No. 18 and 19 with advance notice.
7. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.
I.A. 6536/2022 & 6537/2022 (Directions)
8. List on 19.05.2022.
CS (COMM) 275/2022
9. Let plaint be registered as a suit.
10. Upon filing of process fee, issue summons to the Defendant, through all permissible modes, returnable on 28.07.2022.
The court emphasized the importance of protecting trademarks and preventing deceptive use through the grant of ex-parte ad-interim injunctions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of ex parte ad-interim injunction in cases of trademark infringement and the Court's authority to issue specific directions under Order 3....
The unauthorized use of a registered trademark by third parties constitutes infringement, necessitating immediate ex parte relief to prevent consumer deception.
The Court upheld the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and preventing unfair competition through the grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks and prevention of infringement and passing off, as well as the application of procedural rules under the Civil Procedu....
The court granted an ex parte injunction against defendants for trademark infringement, finding prima facie merit in the plaintiff's claim and recognizing potential irreparable harm.
(1) An ad interim injunction shall not be granted in derogation of right of opposite party.(2) An order passed without issuing notice to opposite party cannot be brought under purview of Section 36 C....
The judgment establishes the importance of protecting intellectual property rights, territorial jurisdiction in infringement cases, and the enforcement of injunction orders through ICANN regulations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
