C. HARI SHANKAR
Lucina Land Development Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These proceedings emanate from Consumer Case No. 1204/2017, which was a complaint filed before the learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against the petitioner Lucina Land Development Ltd. and others by 51 allotees of flats in a project of the petitioners, titled -Indiabulls Greens Panvel' (the project', hereinafter). The complaint, preferred under Section 21(a)(i)[1] read with Section 12(1)(c) [2] and 22(1)[3] of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (-the 1986 Act') alleged that the petitioners were guilty of deficiency in service and were involved in unfair trade practices within the meaning of Section 2(1)(g)[4] and 2(1)(r) of the 1986 Act.
[1] 21. Jurisdiction of the National Commission. - Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the National Commission shall have jurisdiction - (a) to entertain - (i) complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees one crore;
[2] 12. Manner in which complaint shall be made. - (1) A complaint in relation to any goods sold or delivered or agreed to be sold or delivered or any service provided or agreed to be provided may be filed with a District Forum by - *
A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu v. S. Chellappan & Ors
Anjum Hussain v. Intellicity Business Park Pvt. Ltd.
Chairman, Tamilnadu Housing Board v. T.N.Ganapathy
Cicily Kallarackal v. Vehicle Factory
Rameshwar Prasad Shrivastava v. Dwarkadhis Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai
Vikrant Singh Malik v. Supertech Ltd.
Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai v. Tuticorin Educational Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.