SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, RAJAN SHARMA
Malika Sethi – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. through its Chairman/Managing Director – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Varun Kathuria, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President—The present complaint has been filed by the complainant before this commission alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice by the opposite party and has prayed the following reliefs:—

(a) To direct the Respondent/Opposite Party to refund to the Complainant, a total amount of Rs. 20,28,442.5/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Twenty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Forty Two and Fifty Paisa) alongwith interest @ 24% per annum compounded annually to be calculated from the date of payment till realization;

(b) Direct the Respondent/Opposite Party to pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/ to the complainant, as compensation on account of harassment, mental tension, agony suffered by the complainant;

(c) Award costs of the present complaint in favour of the complainant and against the Respondent/Opposite Party;

(d) pass such other or further orders, as this Hon’ble Forum may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that the Complainant booked an apartment bearing no. T7-303 with the opposite party in the project ‘Parsvnath Pri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top