SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1515

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Central Bureau Of Investigation - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
W.P.(Crl) 833 of 2022
Decided On : 19-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anupam S Sharma, SPP with Mr. Prakarsh Airan and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates and Inspector S. Sridhar Iyer, for the Appellant; Appearance not given, for the Respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that a subordinate court does not have the jurisdiction to issue a show-cause notice for Contempt of Court and that such actions must be in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Contempt of Courts Act and the Rules framed by the High Court.

Headnote:

Contempt of Court - Criminal Procedure - The court set aside the order issued by the Special Judge directing the Director of CBI to explain why not a reference of Contempt of Court be made against the respective officers of CBI for non-compliance of orders. The court held that the Special Judge did not have the jurisdiction to issue such an order and it was against the procedure laid down under the Contempt of Courts Act and the Rules framed by the High Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking setting aside of orders passed by the Special Judge (CBI-XIII) related to the production of documents and a show-cause notice issued to the Director of CBI for non-compliance of orders.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the order issued by the Special Judge and allowed the petition partly, disposing of the matter.

Issues: The issues involved the jurisdiction of the Special Judge to issue a show-cause notice for Contempt of Court against the Director of CBI and the respective officers for non-compliance of orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Special Judge did not have the jurisdiction to issue a show-cause notice for Contempt of Court against the Director of CBI and the respective officers for non-compliance of orders, as it was against the procedure laid down under the Contempt of Courts Act and the Rules framed by the High Court.

Final Decision: The impugned order dated 13th April 2022 was set aside, and the petition was partly allowed and disposed of.

    ORDER

    CRL.M.A. 7109/2022

    Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

    The application stands disposed of.

    W.P.(CRL) 833/2022 & CRL.M.A. 7108/2022 (Stay)

    1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking setting aside of orders dated 31st March 2022 and 13th April 2022 passed by learned Special Judge (CBI-XIII), P. C. Act, Rouse Avenue District Court.

    2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/CBI submitted that vide impugned order dated 31st March 2022, the Ld. Special Judge observed that the original complaint on the basis of which the FIR was registered was not made a part of the relied upon documents by the CBI. The Ld. Special Judge, in order to appreciate what exactly was done in the course of further investigation and on what basis the original complaint was left to be relied upon in the present case, thought it prudent to direct the Investigating Officer to produce complete Case Diaries as well as complete Crime File including FR-I and FR-II.

    3. It is submitted that on 13th April 2022, an application was moved by the Investigating Officer seeking adjournment on the ground that the matter regarding the production of documents as directed by the Court was pending consideration with higher officials. The Ld. Special Judge however, vide impugned order dated 13th April 2022, took it to be a Contempt of Court and as such, issued Show-Cause Notice to the Director, CBI to explain why not a reference of Contempt of Court be made by him against the respective officers of CBI for deliberate non-compliance of his orders as well as directed the Director, CBI to identify the responsible officers, obtain their reply and send the same to the Court besides disclosing the particulars of such officers who opted to ignore the time-frame and did not comply with the orders of the Ld. Special Judge.

    4. It is submitted that as such, there was no deliberate or wilful disobedience of the orders of the Court nor was there any conscious defiance of the orders of the Ld. Special Judge. It has been vehemently submitted that the show cause notice issued to the Director of the CBI for initiation of the contempt vide order dated 13th April 2022 is in total disregard to the process of law and procedure since the court concerned does not have the powers of contempt, and therefore merits to be set aside by this Court.

    5. As regards the Order dated 31st March 2022, learned counsel for CBI on instructions conceded that the said order passed by the Court below shall be duly complied, without prejudice to the rights of the parties and the question of law involved.

    6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/CBI and perused the record.

    7. As far as the Order dated 31st March 2022 is concerned, as per the oral undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the direction passed in the Order shall be duly complied without prejudice to the question of law involved therein, and therefore there is nothing left for adjudication qua the said order in the instant writ petition.

    8. The Court concerned has passed the impugned Order dated 13th April 2022 wherein Show-Cause Notice was issued to the Director, CBI to explain why not a reference of Contempt of Court be made by him against the respective officers of CBI for deliberate non-compliance of his orders.

    9. Under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, the High Court has the jurisdiction to take cognizance of an alleged contempt having been committed in respect of subordinate courts. In order to bring the conduct to the notice of the High Court, the subordinate court is supposed to send a reference of the matter to the High Court. A subordinate court on its own cannot assume jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act and issue show cause notice as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated.

    10. Even otherwise under Section 15 of the said Act, only the Supr

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top