Nominative fair use and Section 30 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 were central to the judgment, allowing the use of the 'GeM' mark for informational purposes without creating misrepresentation.

ORDER

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral). - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

CS (COMM) 205/2020 & I.As. 4967/2020, 4753-54/2021

2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff - The Government E Marketplace (hereinafter 'GeM'), which is a National Public Procurement portal and end to end online marketplace from where both Central and State Government Ministries /Departments, CPSUs and SPSUs effect the procurement of goods and services. The mark used by the Plaintiff is 'GeM' along with the logo, which is depicted below:

3. The case of the Plaintiff in the present suit is that there are several parties, who are either registering ' GeM in respect of procurement of goods and services as a domain name or using the term ' GeM as a URL extension of their usual websites. Some of the parties are providing services to enable businesses to register on the 'GeM portal. Therefore, the Plaintiff is aggrieved by the fact that the Defendants seemed to be claiming to the public at large, that they are associated with the Plaintiff, thereby misrepresenting their status qua the Plaintiff and also adversely impacting the Plaintiff's brand equity and goodwill. In the present case, the following URLs have been impugned:

1. https: //www. unilexconsultants. com/re gistrations/GEM- Registration/

2. https://charteredmunshi.com/gem-registration

3. https://complykart.com/service/GEM-Registration

4. https://www.digitalsanjay.com/gem-registration-govemment-e- marketplace/

5. https://gemgov.in/

6. http: //www.legalbrothers. in/service/gem-re gistration/

7. http: //www. maanof. co. in/gem-registration. html

8. https://prospectdigital.in/gem-government-e-marketplace- registration-consultant/

9. https://www.e-startupindia.com/gem-registration.html

10. https://registrationseva.com/gem-registration-in-india/

11. https://www.legalsalaah.com/gem-registration.html

12. https://gem-registration.org/

13. https: //apkpure. com/

14. https://www.ezzus.com/services/gems-portal-registration

4. In the present suit, various persons who are using the objectionable domain names/URL extensions have been impleaded as Defendant Nos.1 to 11. Defendant Nos.12 to 14 are registered by John Does, whose whereabouts are not known. Defendant No.15 is the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (hereinafter 'MEITY'). Defendant Nos.16 to 18 are the Registrars of various domain names/URLs, wherein the objectionable term 'GeM' has been used. Defendant No.19 is a company where Defendant No.2 is a shareholder and director. Various orders have been passed from time to time in this matter. A brief background of the decrees passed against various Defendants is captured hereinbelow.

5. Initially, vide order dated 1st July, 2020, an ad interim injunction was passed in this matter, directing suspension of the impugned domain names in the following terms:

'9. I am, for the moment, persuaded by the arguments advanced by Mr. Sharma that if interim relief, as sought for, is not granted, it would jeopardise not only the interest of the plaintiff, but of the users at large, and thus, impact, inter alia, public interest as well.

XXX

11. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, the Registrars of the domain names concerning defendant Nos.1 to 14 shall suspend the domain names of defendant Nos. 1 to 14.

11.1 The Registrars of domain names, who have been arrayed as parties, are shown as defendant Nos.l6 to 18 in the memo of parties.

11.2 Defendant No. 16 to 18 will comply the directions issued hereinabove, immediately, upon receipt of a copy of the order passed today. '

6. Thereafter, on 17th July, 2020, vide two applications being filed on behalf Defendant Nos.9 & 10, the said Defendants agreed not to include the URL extension 'gem.registration.html' or any other deceptively similar URL extension, as part of their domain names. The said order reads as under:

'3.1 Furthermore, learned counsel says that he is instructed to make a statement on behalf of his clients i.e. defendant nos. 9 and 10 that they would