SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Snapdeal Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Godaddycom LLC – Respondent


Table of Content
1. registration of trade marks (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. relief sought against domain name registrants (Para 7 , 8 , 15 , 16)
3. prior court proceedings against alleged infringers (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. defendants' stance on opposing the plaint (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. plaintiff's argument on trademark infringement (Para 21 , 22 , 25 , 28)
6. intermediary definition under the it act (Para 39 , 40)
7. issues for consideration in judgment (Para 52 , 53 , 54)
8. infringement of trademarks in domain name registration (Para 68 , 75)
9. rejection of interim injunction (Para 99 , 100 , 101)

JUDGMENT

LA. 5407/2021 in CS(COMM) 176/2021

1. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the following trade marks:

TrademarkRegistration No.ClassRegistration DateStatus
195028535, 3815/04/2010Registered
SNAP DEAL195028635, 3815/04/2010Registered
SNAPDEAL.COM210212435, 3818/02/2011Registered
SNAPDEAL21267593907/04/2011Registered
32035103505/03/2016Registered
35254003514/04/2017Registered
35254013514/04/2017Registered
35254073514/04/2017Registered
31918893522/02/2016Registered

2. The plaintiff refers to these marks, collectively, as the "SNAPDEAL trade marks" and I shall use the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top