SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1701

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mukta Gupta, J.
Naman Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State Through Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Application No. 3673 of 2021
Decided On : 04-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
Anurag Bindal, Advocate, Ankur Gupta, Advocate, B. Khan, Advocate, Rajesh Manchanda, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the petitioner's role in the drug trafficking network and the admissibility of statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act in granting bail.

Headnote:

NDPS - Bail - Sections 8(c)/20/22/29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes an embargo on granting bail, and the admissibility of statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The court also considered the evidence related to the petitioner's involvement in a drug trafficking group and the transactions of money. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of the petitioner's role in the drug network and the nature of his involvement in consuming narcotics drugs.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case under Sections 8(c)/20/22/29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution's case involved the recovery of contraband from various individuals linked to a drug trafficking network, with the petitioner being one of the admins of a social media group involved in the sale and purchase of narcotics.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence indicated the petitioner's involvement in consuming narcotics drugs and his role in the drug trafficking group. It noted that the petitioner was not required for further investigation as the complaint had already been filed by the respondent.

Issues: The key issues involved the petitioner's alleged involvement in a drug trafficking network, the admissibility of statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, and the possibility of granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant bail was based on the petitioner's role in consuming narcotics drugs rather than being a drug trafficker, the completion of the investigation, and the conditions imposed to ensure the petitioner's compliance with the bail terms.

Final Decision: The court directed the release of the petitioner on bail, subject to specific conditions, and disposed of the petition.

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. - By this petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case No. VIII/46/DZU/2021 under Sections 8(c)/20/22/29 of the NDPS act on a complaint filed by the respondent-NCB.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per the statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS act which is inadmissible in evidence, the best case of the respondent is that the petitioner used to consume Ganja in the year 2017 and the payments thereof were made in the year 2021. Even as per the investigation, the group was created by Mohd. aslam and Parichay arora and merely because the petitioner was also made an admin of the group, the liability of the entire group cannot be fastened on the petitioner. Even from the transactions of payments made to Mohd. aslam and Neil Singhvi by the petitioner, at best, four or five transactions have been shown wherein amounts transferred are ?11,000, ?5700, ?1000, ?2000 etc. The petitioner is not a drug trafficker. Though not admitting, even if at some stage the petitioner consumed the drugs, the same would not amount to dealing in a drug trafficking racket. He further states that the similarly placed co-accused namely Devesh Vasa has been granted bail by this Court and aashray Pandey has been granted bail by the learned Special Court and hence, on parity, the petitioner be also granted bail. The petitioner was working after completing his studies at Kolkata when he was picked up by the officers of the respondent and implicated in this case. The complaint has been filed and the petitioner is no more required for investigation.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent states that in view of the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS act, no case for grant of bail to the petitioner is made out as there is every possibility that on being released on bail, the petitioner will again indulge in same kind of activities and the petitioner being a part of the larger drug network, his role cannot be segregated from the other accused.

4. Case of the prosecution in nutshell is that on the basis of an information, Guhan Sarvothaman was intercepted at the IGI airport on 4th august 2021. On his search, 30 gms. of ganja and 0.45 gms. of Ecstasy were recovered. In the interrogation, he revealed about his friend Rahul Mishra, his address and the possibility of recovery of contraband from his house. Search was made at the house of Guhan Sarvothaman at Greater Noida, resulting in recovery of 1 kg of ganja and ?15.5 lakhs in cash. Search was also made at the house of Rahul Mishra at Faridabad from where, 1.05 kg of ganja was recovered. Guhan Sarvothaman further disclosed about one accused aashray Pandey, who was thereafter intercepted at ambience Mall with a parcel containing 410 gms. of ganja. Guhan Sarvothaman also informed about one Tareena Bhatnagar who had promised to get him high quality ganja and for which, she had paid a sum of ?6 lakhs to Jasbir Singh. Thus, the links of Jasbir Singh were sought to be traced and it was found that Jasbir Singh operated under the pseudo name Optims Prime and Sharadha Surana operated under the pseudo name Beanskey on Telegram app in Orient Express Group. The Orient Express Group, wherein, number of people were indulging in sale and purchase of narcotics was created by Parichay arora and Mohd. aslam and the petitioner was one of the admins of the said social media group. On the disclosure of Jasbir Singh and Sharadha Surana, search was conducted at the house of Suvashish Roy at Greater Noida, from where, 1.250 kgs. of Ganja, 16 gms. Ecstasy pills, 6 gms. Heroine, 40 gms. of Charas and 130 gms. of suspected psychotropic substance in different coloured little pills were found and 39.700 gms. concentrate of cannabis and 2.530 gms. liquid cannabis from a parcel at Foreign Post Office, Kolkata. One more accused Raghunath Kumar was identified who was recognized as Shopper stop on Wicket app who used to arrange narcotics drugs. according to the investigation, the contra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top