SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rekha Palli, J.
Aditya Rathore - Appellant
Versus
Delhi Technological University & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 40 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 111 of 2021
Decided On : 09-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate, Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate, Tania Ahlawat, Advocate, Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, Palak Rohmetra, Advocate

No relief can be granted at a belated stage when the admission process is completed.

Headnote:

JEE - Admission Dispute - JEE, Spot Counselling - [Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) - 2020, National Testing Agency Act, 2005] - The court discussed the technical issue of payment not being reflected in the respondent's bank account before the cut-off time, the automated nature of the admission process, and the petitioner's failure to participate in subsequent special spot counselling. The court concluded that despite the petitioner's justified claim, no relief could be granted at a belated stage when the admission process was completed for both the 2020-21 and the next academic session.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought admission to B.Tech Mechanical Engineering through spot counselling but was unable to participate due to a technical issue with the payment not being reflected in the respondent's bank account before the cut-off time.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's claim was justified, but no relief could be granted at a belated stage when the admission process was completed for both the 2020-21 and the next academic session.

Issues: Dispute over admission to B.Tech Mechanical Engineering through spot counselling, technical issue with payment not being reflected in the respondent's bank account, petitioner's failure to participate in subsequent special spot counselling.

Ratio Decidendi: Despite the petitioner's justified claim, no relief could be granted at a belated stage when the admission process was completed for both the 2020-21 and the next academic session.

Final Decision: The writ petition, along with pending applications, is dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. - The petitioner, who had appeared in the Joint Entrance Examination (Main), 2020 ('JEE') conducted by the respondents, has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-

    'a) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the merit list of the spot counselling of the candidates in B. Tech. Mechanical Engineering with specialization in auto Branch; and

    b). Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents to grant admission to the petitioner in B. Tech. Mechanical Engineering with specialization in auto Branch for the academic commencing in the academic year 2020-2021 in accordance with law; and

    c) any other or further order, direction or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem just fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also be passed in favor of the Petitioner.'

    2. Delhi Technological University (DTU), Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University of Women (IGDTUW), Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIITD), Delhi and Netaji Subhash University of Technology (NSUT) participated in the Joint admissions Counselling (JaC) for admission to the undergraduate Engineering programmes offered by the respondent institutes, conducted online with the support of the National Informatics Centre (NIC). The admissions are done on the basis of rank of students in the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) conducted by the National Testing agency (NTa).

    3. The petitioner, a young boy, appeared in the JEE (Main) in april, 2020 for admission to Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering. The petitioner obtained a rank of 36884 but was not able to secure admission in the initial rounds of counselling. Upon the schedule for the spot round admission process being announced for open counselling for the leftover seats for some of the courses, the petitioner, on 04.12.2020 deposited the online spot counselling fees of INR 10,000 at 6.58 pm from the petitioner's HDFC bank account, through the payment gateway of the respondents, vide UPI transaction No. 033918007807, which amount it is claimed was debited from the petitioner's bank account on 04.12.2020 itself.

    4. However, since the payment of the spot counselling fee of INR 10,000 by the petitioner was not reflected in the respondents' bank account, before 11.59 pm on 04.12.2020, which was the cut-off for depositing the said fee to participate in the spot counselling round, the petitioner was not able to participate in the online spot round of counselling.

    5. Immediately thereafter, the petitioner, through his father, sent emails on 04.12.2020 and 09.12.2020 to the respondents complaining about the petitioner's inability to access the online counselling portal of the respondents, but received no response.

    6. It is in these circumstances, that the petitioner approached this Court by way of the present petition on 30.12.2020, which came to be listed before this Court for the first time on 05.01.2021. Upon notice being issued, a counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents, wherein it has been pointed that, since the entire process was online, the respondents cannot be faulted for the petitioner's inability to join in the Spot round counselling, as it is an admitted position that the amount was not credited in the respondents' bank account before the cut-off.

    7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was desirous of taking admission in B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering with specialisation in auto), and a seat in the said course was available with the respondent no.1/Delhi Technological University ('DTU') in the on-the-spot counselling held on 04.12.2020. He contends that the last candidate who was allotted a seat in the Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering, with specialization in auto, secured a rank of 36906, while the petitioner, who was desirous of pursuing the said course, had obt

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top