IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, JJ
Nikhil Telam, son of Arjun Telam – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No.1686 of 2021
Decided on : 09-02-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 – Article, 226 – Power of High Court to issue Certain Writs – Admission Rules for Technical Institute – Case of petitioner that after passing examination of participated in first phase of counselling for course of Bachelor of Engineering Bachelor of Technology documents verification obtained admission in respondent requisite fee was also deposited through attending online classes without any interruption – Held, Contention of petitioner that some other person filled up form in third round of counselling on his behalf and he did not register for third phase of counselling is not acceptable – Case of petitioner that after passing examination participated in first phase of counselling for course of Bachelor of Engineering Bachelor of Technology documents verification obtained admission in respondent for which requisite fee was also deposited through a challan and he was attending online classes without any interruption – Writ petition dismissed.
ORDER :
Arvind Singh Chandel, J.
1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/quash the impugned cancellation of admission form (Annexure P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to complete the course and to appear in the examination of Bachelor of Engineering/Technology (B.E./B.Tech) course in the respondent no.3 College, in accordance with law.
10.3 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.”
2. It is the case of the petitioner that after passing examination of 12 standard, he participated in first phase of counselling for the course of Bachelor of Engineering/Bachelor of Technology (B.E./B.Tech.) for the academic session 2020-21. After documents verification, he obtained admission in respondent 3/college for which the requisite fee was also deposited through a challan and he was attending the online classes without any interruption. Suddenly, his admission is cancelled vide Annexure P1 dated 19.11.2020 without issuing him any notice and affording any opportunity of hearing. Hence, this petition.
3. In their reply, the respondents/State submit that the Admission Rules for Technical Institute’s of Chhattisgarh, 2020 (henceforth ‘the Rules of 2020’) have been framed and are made available to all the technical institutes and candidates seeking admission in technical and professional courses in the Chhattisgarh State. The said rules govern the entire admission procedure with respect to technical and professional courses including B.E./B.Tech. Rule 8.4.8 of the Rules of 2020 specifically prescribes that if any candidate has been allotted a seat in a course/institute in the first/subsequent phase and if further phase of counselling takes place, the candidate, if so desires, is allowed to participate in the counselling, but, on his/her registering for the next phase and on documents verification, the present allotment shall automatically be cancelled and that seat shall be added to vacant seats. Similarly, vide notification dated 9.9.2020, a detailed admission procedure for online counselling for the session 2020-21 has been published and uploaded in the website, wherein also Clause 26(1) deals with candidates who have been allotted seats in the first phase and have taken admission in the college. Such candidates are allowed to participate in the subsequent phase of counselling if they are not satisfied with their allotted seat. However, if such a candidate gets himself registered for next phase and appears for counselling in the subsequent phase, his earlier allotted seat is automatically cancelled. The petitioner being fully aware about the admission rules, the notification and the procedure for participation, got himself registered for the first phase of counselling and was allotted a seat of his choice on merit basis in respondent 3/college and also got admission in the said college as per his allotment. Thereafter, he again got himself registered for the third phase of counselling and appeared in the counselling wherein as per his merit, he has been allotted Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College, Lakhanpur, Ambikapur as per his choice. Despite getting allotment of the seat, he did not report in the college for admission. Therefore, now, at this stage, he cannot claim any admission pursuant to his allotment of seat in the first phase as the said seat has already got vacant and has been allotted in the third round of counselling to some other candidate on merit basis. Therefore, this petition having no merit is liable to be dismissed.
4. In his rejoinder to the reply of the respondents/State, the petitioner submits that after obtaining admission in respondent 3/college, he neither reg
The court ruled that administrative cancellations of provisional admissions in medical education must adhere to constitutional principles, and no vested rights arise from provisional allotments under....
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
Admissions to medical colleges must be based on merit and conducted through authorized counseling, and any admission contrary to the mandatory provisions cannot be approved.
Number of seats for MBBS/BDS Courses in an Institution is fixed and cannot be increased at whims.
A procedural mistake by a student may be excused when it risks depriving a meritorious candidate of their admission, emphasizing the importance of justice over strict adherence to rules.
The High Court cannot direct the creation of additional seats for admission contrary to the statutory framework.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of strict and uniform application of rules in the admission process to maintain the integrity and sanctity of the process.
The court upheld the cancellation of admission based on the petitioner's failure to meet the eligibility criteria, affirming that procedural fairness was maintained despite the lack of a formal order....
The court upheld that while institutions possess the right to admit students, there is no entitlement to fill all available seats, emphasizing merit-based admissions per regulatory guidelines.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.