Back
ANU MALHOTRA
Mohd. Tabsir – Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
anu Malhotra, J. - The appellant vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 28.2.2020 and the impugned order on sentence dated 11.3.2020 of the Court of the learned additional Sessions Judge-05, POCSO, Saket Court in FIR no. 527/2013 PS Mehrauli, whereby the appellant has been held guilty and has been convicted under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 of the POCSO act, 2012 and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six years for commission of the offence punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO act,2012 and a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 30 days submitting inter alia to the effect that he has been falsely implicated in the case.
2. along with the appeal was Crl.M.B.No. 1162/2021 filed by the appellant seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal. Vide order dated 16.9.2021, it being the first appeal, the same was admitted for hearing. The Trial Court Record was directed to be requisitioned in the e-form and the physical form and the Trial Court Record has since been received. Vide order dated 16.9.2021, notice of the appeal was als
The main legal point established is the reliance on consistent and credible testimonies to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The reliability of a child witness's testimony and the rule of prudence in accepting such evidence if found to be truthful.
The victim's testimony in a sexual assault case stands at a higher pedestal than injured witness and needs no corroboration.
A judgment must explicitly formulate points for determination and provide a reasoned analysis of all evidence, including defense testimony. Failure to address the defense case, provide a logical narr....
The court upheld the conviction based on the victim's credible testimony and medical evidence, affirming that under the POCSO Act, the burden shifts to the accused to rebut presumption of guilt.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the definition of 'Aggravated Sexual Assault' under the POCSO Act, based on the evidence and legal provisi....
A conviction under the POCSO Act cannot stand if the victim's testimony contains significant inconsistencies regarding material facts, undermining the credibility of the prosecution's case.
Minor penetration constitutes sexual assault under the POCSO Act, validating the conviction; the court modified the sentence in consideration of prior incarceration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
