Back
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Furniture Block Market Association – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - CM aPPL.4307/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1515/2022 & CM aPPL. 4306/2022
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to de-seal the premises of the members of the petitioner association which were sealed on 20.01.2022 and further seeks setting aside of the show cause notice dated 22.12.2021 and sealing order dated 20.01.2022.
3. Learned counsel submits that no opportunity of challenging the sealing order was granted to the petitioners as the properties were sealed the very same day on which the sealing order was passed.
4. Learned counsel further submits that no opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the petitioners prior to passing of the sealing order.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that respondent No.1 is incorrectly stating that conversion charges are liable to be paid whereas no conversion charges are liable to be paid for the subject market.
6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4.
7. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the members of
The court emphasized the importance of granting an opportunity for a hearing and providing a chance for legal recourse in case of any further cause of sealing, without expressing any opinion on the m....
The court affirmed the necessity of providing a fair opportunity to be heard before punitive administrative actions, highlighting the principles of natural justice.
The court affirmed the necessity of a personal hearing before administrative decisions regarding de-sealing are made, emphasizing the importance of due process.
The High Court will not entertain a Writ Petition when alternative remedies are available through administrative bodies like the Monitoring Committee.
The Monitoring Committee's order permitting permanent de-sealing subject to payment of penalty charges prevails, and the petitioner's remedy lies in approaching the Monitoring Committee or the Suprem....
Municipal corporations must expeditiously consider applications for de-sealing properties in accordance with prevailing laws, requiring such applications to be submitted first.
The court ruled that the petition was satisfied as the flat in question had been permanently de-sealed by the MCD.
The court has the discretion to decline certain prayers while allowing alternative reliefs, taking into account the avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings.
A court may grant limited, temporary de-sealing of a premises under official supervision to allow a tenant to retrieve personal belongings, without prejudice to the ongoing legal proceedings before t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
