JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a restraint on the respondents from raising any construction in property bearing No.12, Vivekanand Puri, Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi.

3. It is contended that on account of the construction that is being raised in the subject property and digging of the basement, the property of the petitioner being property No.11, Vivekanand Puri, Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi tilted and got damaged.

4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 as also by counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submits that there is a sanctioned plan for raising construction and even construction of the basement has been sanctioned.

6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that certain compensation was sought by the petitioner and which was not acceded to on account of which the subject petition has been filed. He disputes the photographs placed on record. He submits that the adjoining area had fallen down on its own and immediate steps for repair of the same were undertaken.

7. He however submits that in case