SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1441

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Sulekh Malik - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation Through Deputy Commissioner & Anr. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 10125 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 31236 of 2021
Decided On : 17-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Sunil Chauhan, Advocate, Vatsala Chauhan, Advocate, Tushar Sannu, Advocate, Priyanka Tiwary, Advocate, Fayaz Hasan, Advocate, Tabrez Ahmad, Advocate

Requirement of a sanctioned building plan and measures to protect structural integrity in property disputes.

Headnote:

Unauthorized Construction - Property Dispute - The court directed the respondents to stop unauthorized construction activity, ensure structural integrity of the petitioner's property, and refrain from raising any construction without a sanctioned building plan.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a direction to stop illegal unauthorized construction activity affecting the structural integrity of their property.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to ensure no unauthorized construction activity, build a wall as directed, and refrain from raising any construction without a sanctioned building plan.

Issues: Unauthorized construction, structural integrity, building plan sanction

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for a sanctioned building plan and measures to protect the structural integrity of the petitioner's property.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed with directions to stop unauthorized construction, ensure structural integrity, and refrain from raising any construction without a sanctioned building plan.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction to respondents to stop the illegal unauthorized construction activity being carried out in House No.12, measuring 200 square yards in Khasra No.52, situated in the revenue estate of village-Kishan Garh, Mehrauli, Delhi, now known as Bhawani Kunj, D-2, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi.,

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of digging of the basement, the structural integrity of the property of the petitioner has been affected.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that there is no sanctioned building plan for raising the construction. He submits that in terms of the order dated 14.09.2021, property of the petitioner was inspected and respondent No.2 was directed to raise a wall in the basement to ensure that there is no damage to the property of the petitioner and structural integrity thereof is maintained.

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 undertakes on behalf of respondent No.2 that no unauthorized construction activity shall be carried out in the subject property and no construction shall be carried out until and unless a building plan is sanctioned by the Municipal Corporation. He further submits that respondent No.2 shall build a wall as directed by the officers of the Corporation to ensure that structural integrity of the property of the petitioner is protected.

6. The undertaking is accepted.

7. In view of the above, this petition is disposed with following directions:-

    (i) Respondent/Corporation shall ensure that no unauthorized construction activity is carried out in the subject property except in accordance with a sanctioned building plan.

    (ii) Respondent No.2 shall ensure that the wall as directed by the officers of the Corporation is built and the earth that has moved from underneath the property of the petitioner is re-filled so that the structural integrity of the property is preserved.

    (iii) No construction shall be raised on the subject property by respondent No.2 until and unless a building plan is sanctioned by the Corporation.

    8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above directions and disposal of the petition, he shall not be pressing the contempt application that has already been filed but not listed.

    9. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through e-mail by the Court Master.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top