Back
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Paramount Polymers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle - 19(1), New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, (Oral) J. - Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31st July, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) along with notice dated 31st July, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') for the assessment year 2017-18.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent vide the said order sought to justify the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2017-18 alleging escapement of income to the tune of Rs.33,67,382/- on account of the erstwhile Company being a non-filer, not considering the fact that the erstwhile Company got amalgamated with the Petitioner vide an order of NCLT dated 8th November, 2017 resulting in the merger of all the transactions entered into by the erstwhile company, including the impugned transactions with the results of the Petitioner Company for the relevant previous year, and was duly disclosed, and offered to tax, and also assessed by the respondent-revenue.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent wrongfully passed the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act ignoring the contentions of the Petitioner that assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act had
The court emphasized the importance of considering the contentions of the petitioner and maintaining consistency in decisions under the Income Tax Act.
The court emphasized that existing assessments and company mergers must be considered before reopening tax assessments, supporting fairness in administrative actions.
The court upheld the authority of the Assessing Officer to reassess income under amended provisions of the Income Tax Act, reinforcing that objections can be addressed during reassessment proceedings....
The court established that reopening assessments requires a clear and valid reason to believe that income has escaped assessment, which was not present in this case.
A reassessment order is invalid if it violates natural justice by failing to provide a party the opportunity to respond to a notice before its compliance deadline.
Reassessment proceedings are invalid if initiated against a non-existent entity and without considering the taxpayer's response, breaching principles of natural justice.
The judgment established the importance of tangible material and the prohibition of a mere change of opinion in the exercise of power under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Reopening of assessment beyond four years without fresh tangible material or proper disposal of objections is illegal under the Income Tax Act.
The main legal point established is that a notice for reassessment cannot be based on a change of opinion but must be grounded on the grounds of income escaping assessment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
