SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Jindal Dyechem Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to reassessment notice and order. (Para 1)
2. claims regarding void notice and natural justice. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of compliance and natural justice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. assessment order set aside for procedural violations. (Para 8)
5. order for fresh hearing and petition disposition. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the reassessment notice dated 27th March, 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [`the Act'] as well as the assessment order dated 30th March, 2022 passed under Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Act for assessment year 2014-15.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned notice as well as the impugned order are void ab initio as they have been issued in the name of "M/s Lumax Caplease Pvt. Ltd." a non-existent entity which had merged with the Petitioner company with effect from 1st April, 2013 vide order dated 6th August, 2014 passed by this Court under Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the income alleged to have escaped assessment had been offered t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top