IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
M/s Sudhirbhai Saree Wala Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
M/s Keyal Empire Designs Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
FAO (COMM) 25 of 2023 & CM APPLs.3649-3650 of 2023, FAO (COMM) 26 of 2023, CAV 57 of 2023 & CM APPLs.3652-3653 of 2023
Decided On : 25-01-2023
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXXIX Rule 1, 2, 4 - Ex-parte injunction order - Challenging ex-parte injunction order – Held, Appellant has an alternative effective remedy of filing an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, this Court disposes of present appeals along with applications with liberty to appellant to file an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC in both suits before Trial Court - In event such applications and reply affidavits to Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC are filed within stipulated time, respondent-plaintiff shall file its reply and rejoinder within two working days - Appeals disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
MANMOHAN, J.
CM APPL.3651/2023 (exemption) in FAO (COMM) 25/2023
CM APPL.3654/2023 (exemption) in FAO (COMM) 26/2023
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
FAO (COMM) 25/2023 & CM APPLs.3649-3650/2023 FAO (COMM) 26/2023, CAV 57/2023 & CM APPLs.3652-3653/2023
1. Present appeals have been filed challenging the ex-parte injunction order dated 10th January, 2023 passed by the learned District Judge, South District, Saket, New Delhi in CS (COMM) 20 & 21 of 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant-defendant states that the impugned orders are silent as to the claims of the Respondent/ Plaintiff on whether it claims a right in specific borders or material or colour combination or embroidery or its placement or its configurations or figurines but just refers to the Respondent/ Plaintiff original artistic work of a lehenga.
3. He also states that the impugned order has not only jeopardized the entire business of the Appellant, as the appellant had made the lehengas on order but has also ‘jeopardized some marriages’ as the orders have been placed by ladies who are to get married or who have to attend the marriage.
4. Mr.Chander Lall, learned senior counsel for the respondent-plaintiff, who appears on advance notice, disputes the aforesaid submission. He, however, states that the respondent has no objection if the date of hearing is pre-poned in the matter.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid as well as the fact that the appellant has an alternative effective remedy of filing an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, this Court disposes of the present appeals along with applications with liberty to the appellant to file an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC in both suits before the Trial Court on or before 27th January, 2023.
6. In the event such applications and reply affidavits to Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC are filed within the stipulated time, the respondent-plaintiff shall file its reply and rejoinder within two working days, i.e. on or before 1st February, 2023. Response thereto, if any, be filed on 2nd February, 2023.
7. List the matter before the Trial Court for hearing and disposal of the injunction application as well as Order XXXIX Rule 4 application on 3rd February, 2023. Needless to state, the Trial Court shall decide the matter uninfluenced by any observations made by this Court. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. With the aforesaid directions, the present appeals stand disposed of.
The court emphasized the necessity for timely decisions on ex parte injunctions, affirming the right of appellants to use trademarks without undue delay.
A trial court must address all claims for interim relief, and any failure to adequately consider such claims necessitates appellate intervention.
Importance of complying with court orders and limited role of the appellate court in interfering with the impugned order.
The court can advance hearing dates and allow service of documents via multiple means to expedite judicial proceedings.
The court upheld the grant of a temporary injunction due to established copyright ownership and urgency in preventing further infringement, emphasizing the need for protection against irreparable har....
A temporary injunction can be granted to a defendant against a plaintiff, even without a counter-claim, if the relief sought arises directly from or is incidental to the plaintiff’s cause of action. ....
The court has the discretion to grant exemptions from serving advance notice and can direct the trial court to take up a matter at an early date for consideration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.