Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Disposafe Health and Life Care Limited – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Syringes and Medical Devices Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against trial court's judgment (Para 2) |
| 2. contentions about trademark rights (Para 3) |
| 3. need for trial court's examination of records (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. setting aside judgment to rule on interim relief (Para 7) |
| 5. conclusion and order of the court (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):
CM APPLs. 34622-23/2021
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
FAO (COMM) 143/2021
2. This is an appeal directed against common judgement dated 11.02.2020, passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court) - 01, Patiala House Court, New Delhi [hereafter referred to as the "trial Court"] on an application filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [in short "CPC"] as also on the application filed by the respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1 under Section 10 read with Section 151 of the CPC.
3. Mr. Amit Sibal, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant, has drawn our attention to the operative directions, which are contained in paragraph 34 of the impugned judgment.
3.1. For the sake of convenience, the operative directions are extracted hereafter:
"34. After conside
A trial court must address all claims for interim relief, and any failure to adequately consider such claims necessitates appellate intervention.
(1) Letters Patent Appeal – Word ‘judgment’ has a concept of finality in a broader and not in a narrower sense--Where an order vitally affects a valuable right of defendants, it will be treated as a ....
The court emphasized that applications for injunctive relief must be decided together, as one affects the other, ensuring a fair judicial process.
“3A Where an injunction has been granted without giving notice to the opposite party, the court shall make an endeavour to finally dispose of the application within thirty days from the date on which....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of an exparte order of temporary injunction must comply with the Trinity Test as mandated by the Supreme Court, and the trial Court ....
The combination of common words can be distinctive and unique as a trade mark, and the appellate forum has a limited role and cannot entertain new issues or documents at the appellate stage.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the lack of merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the family association with the trade mark Jain Shikanji, the maintainability of the sui....
The court emphasized the necessity for timely decisions on ex parte injunctions, affirming the right of appellants to use trademarks without undue delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
