JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Mr. Piyush Mittal against the Respondent No.1 - North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) and his wife i.e., Respondent No. 2 - Ms. Shilpi Mittal seeking a vigilance enquiry against the Respondent No. 2.

3. The present is a classic case wherein a matrimonial dispute between a couple has resulted in a completely tangential proceeding being pursued by the Petitioner/husband to jeopardise and cause damage to his wife’s employment.

4. The case of the Petitioner is that the Respondent No. 2 and the Petitioner married on 5th May, 2013. At that time Respondent No. 2 was working with the Respondent No.1 as a primary teacher on contract basis. She became a permanent employee in September, 2015. According to the Petitioner, she was able to get this job due to her uncle who was working as Principal in Adarsh Nagar, MCD School in the evening shift. In 2016, Respondent No. 2 left the matrimonial home and disputes ensued between the parties.

5. According to the Petitioner, Respondent No.2 had attended various Court proceedings before the Rohini District Courts,