Back
JYOTI SINGH
Adya Prasad Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to dismissal of vice-chancellor (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of vice-chancellor's tenure (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding procedural violations in inquiry (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. defense on credibility and competency of inquiry committee (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. judicial standards on administrative inquiry procedures (Para 28 , 29) |
| 6. court's evaluation of inquiry and opportunities provided (Para 33 , 36 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. ongoing administrative crises in the university (Para 34) |
| 8. findings and their implication in the context of natural justice (Para 46 , 50 , 52 , 62) |
| 9. judgment and dismissal of the petition (Para 64) |
JUDGMENT
1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.02.2020 whereby Petitioner has been dismissed from the post of Vice-Chancellor, Manipur University. A direction is also sought in the nature of mandamus to the Respondents to restore the appointment of the Petitioner to the said post to enable him to complete his remaining tenure, with consequential benefits, as well as for quashing the advertisement dated 16.03.2020, published for fresh appointment of Vice-Chancellor of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
