Adya Prasad Pandey vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Adya Prasad Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. background of vice chancellor's dismissal case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. appellant's allegations of procedural unfairness. (Para 3)
3. relationship between inquiry procedures and grounds for appeal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. appellant's failure to engage with inquiry process. (Para 7 , 8)
5. nature of evidence and findings from inquiry. (Para 9 , 10)
6. application of article 311 protections and legal status of vice chancellor. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. conclusion regarding appeal and application for additional documents. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. The present intra Court appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act has been filed impugning the judgment dated 9th April, 2021 passed in W.P. (C) No. 4031/2020 whereby the Ld. Single Judge of this Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner/appellant herein, inter alia seeking (i) quashing of the order dated 21st February, 2020 passed by the respondent no. 1 of dismissal of the appellant from the post of Vice-Chancellor, Manipur University; (ii) quashing of advertisement dated 16th March, 2020 published for fresh appointment of Vice Chancellor of the Manipur University; (iii) direction to restore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSALAdya Prasad Pandey – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Adya Prasad Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent